Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incorporating the sampling design in weighting adjustments for panel attrition.

Statistics in medicine·2015
Same author

To Treat or to Prevent?: Reducing the Population Burden of Violence-related Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2015
Same author

Latent profile analyses of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed soldiers.

Journal of psychiatric research·2015
Same author

The CHANGE Study: Methods and Sample Description for a Cross-Sectional Study of Heroin Cessation in New York City.

Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2015
Same author

Gun ownership and social gun culture.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2015
Same author

The Mental Health Consequences of Mass Shootings.

Trauma, violence & abuse·2015
Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Maternal Cesarean Section and Offspring ASD or ADHD Risk: A Nurses' Health Study II Analysis.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An argument for a consequentialist epidemiology.

Sandro Galea

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |September 12, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Epidemiology needs to refocus on disease intervention, not just cause identification. A consequentialist approach can enhance public health relevance and guide research priorities for greater impact.

    Keywords:
    futurehistorymethodsphilosophy

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 8, 2026

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Public Health Philosophy

    Background:

    • Epidemiology traditionally focuses on disease causes and distribution.
    • Recent emphasis on identifying causes may overshadow the equally important goal of disease intervention and control.
    • This shift potentially diminishes the field's practical relevance in public health.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for a consequentialist framework in epidemiology.
    • To recalibrate the philosophical foundations of the discipline.
    • To re-emphasize the importance of intervention and its impact.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical argument and conceptual analysis.
    • Comparison of consequentialist and deontological ethical frameworks.
    • Discussion of implications for research, practice, and education.

    Main Results:

    • Epidemiology is fundamentally more aligned with a consequentialist than a deontological approach.
    • Adopting consequentialism clarifies research priorities and evaluation metrics for new methods.
    • It elevates global health, equity, implementation science, and teaching.

    Conclusions:

    • A consequentialist epidemiology strengthens the discipline's focus on actionable outcomes.
    • This reframing is crucial for maintaining and enhancing epidemiology's relevance in addressing global health challenges.
    • It provides a clear philosophical basis for prioritizing interventions and translational research.