Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Accelerated Type 1 Diabetes Induction in Mice by Adoptive Transfer of Diabetogenic CD4+ T Cells
Published on: May 6, 2013
Testing agents for prevention or reversal of type 1 diabetes in rodents
Christian W Grant1, Catherine M Moran-Paul, Shane K Duclos
1Biomedical Research Models (BRM), Inc., Worcester and Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Abstract:
We report the results of an independent laboratory's tests of novel agents to prevent or reverse type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse, BioBreeding diabetes prone (BBDP) rat, and multiple autoimmune disease prone (MAD) rat models. Methods were developed to better mimic human clinical trials, including: prescreening, randomization, blinding, and improved glycemic care of the animals. Agents were suggested by the research community in an open call for proposals, and selected for testing by an NIDDK appointed independent review panel. Agents selected for testing to prevent diabetes at later stages of progression in a rodent model were a STAT4 antagonist (DT22669), alpha1 anti-trypsin (Aralast NP), celastrol (a natural product with anti-inflammatory properties), and a Macrophage Inflammatory Factor inhibitor (ISO-092). Agents tested for reversal of established T1D in rodent models were: alpha1 anti-trypsin (Aralast NP), tolerogenic peptides (Tregitopes), and a long-acting formulation of GLP-1 (PGC-GLP-1). None of these agents were seen to prevent or reverse type 1 diabetes, while the positive control interventions were effective: anti-CD3 treatment provided disease reversal in the NOD mouse, dexamethasone prevented T1D induction in the MAD rat, and cyclosporin prevented T1D in the BBDP rat. For some tested agents, details of previous formulation, delivery, or dosing, as well as laboratory procedure, availability of reagents and experimental design, could have impacted our ability to confirm prior reports of efficacy in preclinical animal models. In addition, the testing protocols utilized here provided detection of effects in a range commonly used in placebo controlled clinical trials (for example, 50% effect size), and thus may have been underpowered to observe more limited effects. That said, we believe the results compiled here, showing good control and repeatability, confirm the feasibility of screening diverse test agents in an independent laboratory.
Insights
Novel agents failed to prevent or reverse type 1 diabetes (T1D) in rodent models. Despite rigorous testing, none showed efficacy, though positive controls were effective, confirming the feasibility of independent preclinical screening.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease requiring novel therapeutic strategies.
- Preclinical models are crucial for evaluating potential T1D treatments.
- Independent validation of novel agents is essential for drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To independently test novel agents for preventing or reversing type 1 diabetes (T1D) in established rodent models.
- To assess the efficacy of agents suggested by the research community.
- To validate a rigorous testing methodology mimicking human clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Utilized non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and BioBreeding diabetes prone (BBDP) and multiple autoimmune disease prone (MAD) rats.
- Employed prescreening, randomization, blinding, and improved glycemic care.
- Tested agents including a STAT4 antagonist, alpha1 anti-trypsin, celastrol, a Macrophage Inflammatory Factor inhibitor, tolerogenic peptides, and a GLP-1 formulation.
Main Results:
- None of the tested novel agents demonstrated efficacy in preventing or reversing T1D in the utilized models.
- Positive control interventions (anti-CD3, dexamethasone, cyclosporin) effectively prevented or reversed T1D.
- The study confirmed the feasibility of independent laboratory screening of diverse test agents.
Conclusions:
- The tested novel agents were not effective in preventing or reversing T1D in preclinical models.
- Potential limitations in prior studies' formulation, delivery, dosing, or experimental design may explain discrepancies.
- The developed testing protocols are robust and capable of detecting effects at clinically relevant magnitudes.
Related Concept Videos
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by the...
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
