Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Clinical Microfluidic Chip Platform for the Isolation of Versatile Circulating Tumor Cells
Published on: October 13, 2023
Method validation of circulating tumour cell enumeration at low cell counts
Jeffrey Cummings1, Karen Morris, Cong Zhou
1Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. jcummings@picr.man.ac.uk.
Accurate counting of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) is crucial for cancer patient prognosis. Method validation of the CellSearch™ system revealed significant inter-operator variability at low cell counts, which can be minimized with proper training and guidance.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarker Analysis
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are vital prognostic and predictive biomarkers in cancer care.
- Accurate enumeration of CTCs, especially at low cell counts (<10 cells/7.5 ml), is critical for clinical decision-making.
- The CellSearch™ system is a key technology for CTC detection, necessitating rigorous method validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the CellSearch™ system's performance for enumerating circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in clinical samples.
- To assess and quantify inter-operator variability in CTC detection, particularly in the clinically relevant low cell count range.
- To identify factors contributing to variability and propose methods for improvement.
Main Methods:
- Analytical accuracy was evaluated using quality controls (QCs) and spiked blood samples from healthy volunteers.
- Results were analyzed using β-expectation tolerance intervals (BETI) and β-content γ-confidence tolerance intervals (BCTI).
- Inter-operator error was characterized across 6 readers analyzing 38 patient samples, with a focus on samples containing ≤5 CTCs.
Main Results:
- Imprecision was 3-4 times higher at low QC levels (48 cells) compared to high QC levels (987 cells).
- Individual analysts introduced systematic errors in CTC image interpretation, correlated with training and experience.
- Selecting readers based on BETI and BCTI analysis reduced inter-operator error at ≤5 CTCs from 170% to <30%.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter-operator variability exists in enumerating CTCs at low cell counts.
- This variability is not inherent to the method but can be substantially reduced.
- Implementing simple guidance and ensuring adequate training can improve the reliability of CTC enumeration.
More Related Videos
05:17Micromanipulation of Circulating Tumor Cells for Downstream Molecular Analysis and Metastatic Potential Assessment
Published on: May 14, 2019
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019