Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Efficacy of losartan and carvedilol on central hemodynamics in hypertensives: a prospective, randomized, open,
Eung Ju Kim1, Woo-Hyuk Song2, Jae Ung Lee3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Losartan and carvedilol, both blood pressure medications, showed similar effects on central hemodynamics and metabolic markers over 24 weeks. Losartan demonstrated a slightly better impact on aortic augmentation index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers show better clinical outcomes than atenolol, possibly due to central hemodynamic differences.
- Limited comparative studies exist between RAS blockers and newer vasodilating beta-blockers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the central hemodynamic effects of losartan and carvedilol in hypertensive patients.
- To evaluate the impact of these drugs on arterial stiffness, central blood pressure, and metabolic parameters.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded endpoints.
- 201 hypertensive patients enrolled; 182 analyzed after 24 weeks of losartan or carvedilol treatment.
- Noninvasive measurements included carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), aortic augmentation index (AIx), AIx@HR75, and central blood pressure.
Main Results:
- No significant between-group differences in brachial blood pressure, cfPWV, AIx@HR75, or central blood pressure changes.
- Losartan showed a more favorable effect on the aortic augmentation index (AIx).
- Metabolic and inflammatory parameters, except for uric acid, showed no significant differences between groups.
Conclusions:
- Losartan and carvedilol exhibit comparable effects on central hemodynamic indices, arterial stiffness, and metabolic profiles in hypertensive patients after 24 weeks.
- Both treatments effectively manage peripheral blood pressure, with losartan offering a potential advantage in reducing central arterial pressure augmentation.
Abstract:
Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers have shown clinical outcomes superior to those of the beta (β)-blocker atenolol, despite similar reductions in the peripheral blood pressure (BP), perhaps because of different impacts on central hemodynamics. However, few comparative studies of RAS blockers and newer vasodilating β-blockers have been performed. We compared the central hemodynamic effects of losartan and carvedilol in a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point study. Of the 201 hypertensive patients enrolled, 182 (49.6±9.9 years, losartan group=88 and carvedilol group=94) were analyzed. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), aortic augmentation index (AIx), AIx corrected for a heart rate (HR) of 75 beats per minute (AIx@HR75) and central BP were measured noninvasively at baseline and after a 24-week treatment regimen with losartan or carvedilol. After 24 weeks, there were no between-group differences in the brachial BP, cfPWV, AIx@HR75 or central BP changes, except for a more favorable AIx effect with losartan. The changes in all measured metabolic and inflammatory parameters were also not significantly different between the two groups, except for uric acid. Losartan and carvedilol showed generally comparable effects on central hemodynamic indices, metabolic profile, inflammatory parameters and peripheral arterial pressure with a 24-week treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors