Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Neuroscientists in court
Owen D Jones1, Anthony D Wagner, David L Faigman
1The Law School and Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
Abstract:
Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences. The growing role of neuroscientists in court means that neuroscientists should be aware of important differences between the scientific and legal fields, and, especially, how scientific facts can be easily misunderstood by non-scientists, including judges and jurors.
Related Concept Videos
Neurons as Communicators of the Brain
Cell Body
The cell body, also known...
Cerebrospinal Fluid
CSF Production
CSF is produced mainly in the choroid plexus, a network of capillaries and ependymal cells located within the ventricular system of the brain.
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Synthesis
Neural Circuits
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
Neurogenesis and Regeneration of Nervous Tissue
Neurotransmitters

