Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral-Approach Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective
Constantin Schizas1, Etienne Pralong, Christopher Tzioupis
1From the Departments of *Orthopedics and †Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), and the University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland; and ‡Hirslanden Group of Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Study Design:
Prospective neurophysiological study.
Objective:
To identify and quantify the neurophysiological effects of interspinous distraction during spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Summary Of Background Data:
Interspinous devices have been introduced as an alternative treatment of LSS in selected patients aiming at obtaining indirect decompression. Nevertheless, there is no data on the immediate neurophysiological effect of distraction.
Methods:
Thirty patients with LSS undergoing decompression (14 at single level, 16 at multiple levels) were enrolled, resulting in a total of 48 levels to be analyzed. Before decompression, calibrated incremental distraction simulating interspinous device implantation of 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm was performed. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials were acquired before any distraction, during distraction at each incremental value and after bilateral decompression. We evaluated relative changes of motor evoked potentials normalized to hand muscles and related them to the number of affected levels, LSS radiological severity based on the A to D grading, lordosis, and disc height.
Results:
For single-level disease, 8-mm distraction and open decompression yielded similar improvement in motor evoked potentials not only in levels with morphological grades A or B, but also in levels with morphological grades C or D (i.e., severe or extreme stenosis) (P = 0.32). In contrast, distraction superior to 8 mm was less effective (P ≤ 0.05). In multiple-level stenosis, decompression was significantly more effective than any degree of distraction (P < 0.001). No correlation of those results to disc height or lordosis was observed. Using χ trend test to analyze the effect of distraction, a linear trend favoring moderate over severe stenotic morphology was observed (P = 0.0349).
Conclusion:
Interspinous distraction of 8 mm is sufficient to replicate electrophysiological improvements obtained during full decompression even in severe single-level stenosis but not in multilevel disease. Interspinous distraction has therefore an immediately measurable neurophysiological effect.
Level Of Evidence:
4.
