Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
[Experimental study on the remediation of chromium contaminated groundwater with PRB media]
Wen-Hui Zhu1, Liang-Fei Dong, Xing-Run Wang
1School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China. zhuwenhui055@163.com
Abstract:
Due to the surface reaction between zero-valent iron and Cr(VI), iron cannot be fully utilized in the Fe(0)-Permeable Reactive Barrier(PRB), and the PRB is prone to compaction and blockage. In order to resolve these problems, iron powder coated with different polymer was tested in the treatment of chromium-polluted groundwater. Experimental results demonstrated that sodium alginate (SA) was the best package materials. According to analysis with FEI and EDX, pore structures were created by cross-linking of SA with Ca2+, in which a lot of attaching points exist, and through which Cr(VI) could react with interior iron powder. SA coating cast iron (SAC) and reduced iron (SAR) were tested in the treatment of chromium-polluted groundwater individually; the results showed that the removal efficiency of Cr( VI) by SAC was double that by SAR. After optimization of technology parameters of SAC, the Cr(VI) removal process follows the pseudo first-order kinetics. Based on dynamic experiments with SAC, Cr(VI)/Fe(0) was up to 32.25 mg x g(-1) and the PRB maintained high permeability coefficient (2.38 cm x s(-1)) after complete reaction. Compared with cast iron media is feasible in the remediation of chromium contaminated groundwater.
More Related Videos
13:16A Whole Cell Bioreporter Approach to Assess Transport and Bioavailability of Organic Contaminants in Water Unsaturated Systems
Published on: December 24, 2014
09:39Physical, Chemical and Biological Characterization of Six Biochars Produced for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites
Published on: November 28, 2014