Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Solid–Solid Solutions

Solid–Solid Solutions

The temperature-composition phase diagram of two solids, A and B, which are immiscible in the solid phase but form miscible liquids, shows that when the temperature is low, these two exist as separate, pure solids (A and B). As the temperature increases, they transition into a single-phase liquid solution where A and B coexist. Moving from point a1 to a2 in the phase diagram, the composition changes such that solid B begins to separate from the solution, enriching the remaining liquid with A.

Liquid–Solid Solutions

Liquid–Solid Solutions

The process of a solid dissolving in a liquid to form a solution is governed by the solubility limit, which is the maximum amount of the solid substance, or solute, that can be dissolved in a specific volume of the liquid or solvent. As the solute dissolves, it reaches a point where no more solute can be dissolved at a given temperature - this is known as the saturation point. However, if further solute is added and it manages to dissolve, the solution becomes supersaturated. Supersaturated...

Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing

Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing

Heating a crystalline solid increases the average energy of its atoms, molecules, or ions, and the solid gets hotter. At some point, the added energy becomes large enough to partially overcome the forces holding the molecules or ions of the solid in their fixed positions, and the solid begins the process of transitioning to the liquid state or melting. At this point, the temperature of the solid stops rising, despite the continual input of heat, and it remains constant until all of the solid is...

Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility

Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility

Intermolecular forces are attractive forces that exist between molecules. They dictate several bulk properties, such as melting points, boiling points, and solubilities (miscibilities) of substances. Molar mass, molecular shape, and polarity affect the strength of different intermolecular forces, which influence the magnitude of physical properties across a family of molecules.
Temporary attractive forces like dispersion are present in all molecules, whether they are polar or nonpolar. They...

Molecular and Ionic Solids

Molecular and Ionic Solids

Crystalline solids are divided into four types: molecular, ionic, metallic, and covalent network based on the type of constituent units and their interparticle interactions.
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...

Two Components: Liquid–Liquid Systems

Two Components: Liquid–Liquid Systems

A pressure-composition phase diagram explicitly describes the behavior of an ideal solution of two volatile liquids under varying pressures and compositions. A pressure-composition diagram has two main curves. The bubble point curve represents the plot of pressure versus liquid mole fraction. It indicates the pressure at which the first bubble of vapor forms from the liquid phase as the system pressure decreases.The dew point curve is the pressure versus vapor mole fraction. It indicates the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ab initio molecular dynamics prediction and experimental validation of the 14:4 rare-earth oxide-phosphate structure.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Ab initio stability predictions for rare earth oxyphosphates and experimental confirmation of cerium (III) phases.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Materials Properties Prediction (MAPP): Empowering the Prediction of Material Properties Solely Based on Chemical Formulas.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Same author

Thorium and Rare Earth Monoxides and Related Phases.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Same author

Melting temperature prediction using a graph neural network model: From ancient minerals to new materials.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Same author

Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

Solid-liquid coexistence in small systems: A statistical method to calculate melting temperatures.

Qi-Jun Hong¹, Axel van de Walle

¹Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics

|September 14, 2013

Summary

We developed a fast, accurate method using molecular dynamics simulations to calculate material melting points (MP). This approach reduces computational cost and ensures reliable MP predictions for materials science.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Published on: June 28, 2017

Combining Microfluidics and Microrheology to Determine Rheological Properties of Soft Matter during Repeated Phase Transitions

Combining Microfluidics and Microrheology to Determine Rheological Properties of Soft Matter during Repeated Phase Transitions

Published on: April 19, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Published on: June 28, 2017

Combining Microfluidics and Microrheology to Determine Rheological Properties of Soft Matter during Repeated Phase Transitions

Combining Microfluidics and Microrheology to Determine Rheological Properties of Soft Matter during Repeated Phase Transitions

Published on: April 19, 2018

Area of Science:

Materials Science
Computational Chemistry
Thermodynamics

Background:

Accurate calculation of material melting points (MP) is crucial for materials design and screening.
Traditional methods for MP calculation, such as large-scale coexistence simulations or fast-heating methods, have limitations in terms of computational cost or accuracy (e.g., risk of metastable states).

Purpose of the Study:

To propose an efficient and accurate scheme for calculating the melting point (MP) of materials.
To address the limitations of existing MP calculation methods by reducing computational cost and avoiding metastable states.

Main Methods:

The proposed method utilizes statistical analysis of small-size coexistence molecular dynamics simulations.
Validation was performed using empirical potentials, and the finite-size effect on calculated MPs was systematically studied.
Density functional theory (DFT) was employed for practical examples including tantalum, high-pressure sodium, and NaCl.

Main Results:

The method demonstrates convergence to the exact result in the limit of large system size.
An accuracy within 100 K for MP is typically achieved with simulations involving more than 100 atoms.
The approach proved accurate and flexible across different material types (elemental, high-pressure, and ionic).

Conclusions:

The developed method offers an efficient and accurate alternative for calculating material melting points.
It significantly reduces computational cost compared to traditional large-scale coexistence methods.
This approach is a promising tool for large-scale automated material screening where melting point is a key design criterion.