Related Experiment Videos
A single center experience of stenting in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis
C Castaño1, P García-Bermejo, M R García
1Unit of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; Badalona-Barcelona, Spain - ccastanod@gmail.com.
Insights
Intracranial stenting for atherosclerotic stenosis may be safe and effective, even after conflicting trial results. Careful patient selection and technique are key to successful outcomes and preventing stroke recurrence.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is a significant cause of stroke.
- Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is used to prevent recurrent stroke.
- The SAMMPRIS trial indicated aggressive medical management is superior to PTAS with the Wingspan stent system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intracranial stenting for atherosclerotic stenosis.
- To assess clinical outcomes and complications in patients treated with the Wingspan stent system.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, single-center study of seven consecutive patients.
- Patients had symptomatic, angiographically proven atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis.
- All patients received adjuvant antiplatelet therapy and underwent stenting with the Wingspan system under general anesthesia.
Main Results:
- Successful revascularization was achieved in all patients.
- Four patients had no residual stenosis; three had 20-40% residual stenosis.
- 100% of patients showed clinical improvement and good functional outcomes at three months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2).
- No peri-interventional events or neurologic complications occurred.
Conclusions:
- Intracranial stenting, when performed with meticulous technique and careful patient selection, appears safe and effective.
- These findings contrast with the SAMMPRIS trial, suggesting a potential role for PTAS in select cases.
- Further research is warranted to define optimal patient selection criteria for intracranial stenting.
Abstract:
Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cause of stroke that is increasingly being treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) to prevent recurrent stroke. However, PTAS has been compared with medical management in a randomized trial (SAMMPRIS), where aggressive medical management was superior to PTAS with the use of the Wingspan stent system, however in our experience we have had good results and have experienced no complications with this therapy. In a retrospective, single-center study we enrolled seven consecutive patients with a symptomatic angiographically proven atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis of the anterior and posterior circulation. All cases received adjuvant therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel or ticlopidine) before and after deployment of the device. The procedures were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. We use the Wingspan stent system. The occlusion site was middle cerebral artery (MCA) in three patients, proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) in one patient and vertebrobasilar artery in three patients. Primary interventional successful revascularization was achieved in all cases. Four patients had no residual stenosis, and the other three had 20%, 30% and 40% residual stenosis (Table 1). All patients showed a clinical improvement after stent deployment. No peri-interventional events or neurologic complications occurred directly related to the technique. Patency rate was 100% at the last examination in six cases, one case had a pre-occlusive stenosis, requiring angioplasty. No patients died during the follow-up period, and 100% of patients showed good functional outcome at three months (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2). Although the SAMMPRIS study showed that aggressive medical management was superior to PTAS, our results suggest that intracranial stenting is safe and effective, probably due to an extraordinary selection of candidates and to an exquisite technique.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction