Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Inferential Processing in Autistic and Non-Autistic Readers: New Opportunities for Inquiry.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Charles Bonnet Syndrome: associations between psychosocial measures and visual hallucination characteristics in the visually impaired.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same author

From research to action: recommendations for Charles Bonnet syndrome care and policy.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Language experience and reading ability modulate word recognition in deaf readers.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2025
Same author

Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome?

Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Remote distractor effects and saccadic inhibition: spatial and temporal modulation.

Robin Walker1, Valerie Benson

  • 1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK. Robin.Walker@rhul.ac.uk

Journal of Vision
|September 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The remote distractor effect (RDE) increases saccade latency. While saccadic inhibition (SI) was proposed to cause RDE, experiments suggest multiple inhibitory processes may be involved in saccade control.

Keywords:
lateral interaction effectsremote distractor effectsaccade latencysaccadic inhibitionsuperior colliculustarget selection

More Related Videos

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • The remote distractor effect (RDE) is characterized by increased saccade latency when a visual distractor appears away from the saccade target.
  • Saccadic inhibition (SI) is a phenomenon where saccades are selectively inhibited approximately 90 ms after distractor onset.
  • A recent hypothesis suggests that SI may be the underlying mechanism for the RDE.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether saccadic inhibition (SI) underlies the remote distractor effect (RDE).
  • To examine the influence of distractor eccentricity, spatial location, and onset timing on saccade latency and the RDE.
  • To analyze saccade latency distributions for evidence of SI under varying experimental conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted manipulating distractor eccentricity, spatial location, and stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) relative to the saccade target.
  • Saccade latency and latency distributions were recorded and analyzed.
  • The relationship between distractor properties and saccade behavior was assessed.

Main Results:

  • A robust RDE was observed, significantly modulated by distractor eccentricity.
  • Early distractor onsets produced an RDE without clear evidence of SI, while later onsets showed both RDE and some SI.
  • Mixed blocks of SOAs demonstrated an RDE influenced by eccentricity and SOA, with latency distribution changes consistent with SI timing.

Conclusions:

  • The hypothesis that SI solely underlies the RDE is not fully supported by the findings.
  • Saccade latency changes following visual onsets may involve multiple inhibitory mechanisms.
  • The RDE and SI appear to be distinct but potentially interacting processes in saccade control.