Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
Crossmatch-positive liver transplantation in patients receiving thymoglobulin-rituximab induction
Chandrashekhar A Kubal1, Richard S Mangus, Romil Saxena
11 Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 2 Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 3 Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Methodist Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 4 Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 5 Address correspondence to: Chandrashekhar A. Kubal, M.D., Ph.D., Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Room 4601, Indianapolis, IN.
Background:
Positive crossmatch (CM) in liver transplantation (LT) is associated with worse outcomes. Role of induction immunosuppression in this setting remains to be studied.
Methods:
One thousand consecutive LT patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin±rituximab induction were studied. Pretransplantation sera of 55 CM-positive (CM) patients were tested for C1q-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection required presence of diffuse vascular C4d expression on liver biopsies.
Results:
CM was positive in 112 (11%) recipients. Antibody-mediated rejection was observed in 3 (0.03%) patients, whereas acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurred in 31 (3%) patients. CM status was associated with a higher incidence of ACR (9% in CM vs. 2% in CM-negative [CM]; P<0.01) and chronic rejection (4% in CM vs. 1% in CM; P<0.01). Graft survival was slightly lower in CM patients (at 1 year; 85% in CM vs. 89% in CM; P=0.26). Patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis as a group had a tendency toward CM status as well as developing ACR. Upon multivariate analysis, CM status was the strongest predictor of ACR (B=1.14; P=0.02). Only half of CM patients harbored C1q-fixing DSA. Presence of C1q-fixing DSA was not associated with increased incidence of ACR.
Conclusions:
In LT, CM status is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection, chronic rejection, and slightly worse graft survival. With the use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin±rituximab induction, overall low rejection rates can be achieved in CM LT.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...

