Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Using a Knee Arthrometer to Evaluate Tissue-specific Contributions to Knee Flexion Contracture in the Rat
Published on: November 9, 2018
Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population
R R Wroble1, L A Van Ginkel, E S Grood
1Cincinnati Sportsmedicine and Orthopaedic Center, Ohio.
The KT-1000 arthrometer shows reliable knee translation measurements within and between daily tests. However, paired differences are more consistent than individual knee readings for accurate assessment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Biomechanics
- Medical Device Evaluation
Background:
- The MEDmetric KT-1000 arthrometer is widely used for knee laxity assessment.
- Reliability data for the KT-1000, particularly concerning measurement variability, is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the trial-to-trial, installation-to-installation, and day-to-day variability of anterior/posterior translation measurements using the KT-1000 in normal knees.
- To assess the reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer for clinical use.
Main Methods:
- Six healthy subjects were tested over six consecutive days, with three installations per day.
- Anterior/posterior translation was measured at +/- 89 N and +/- 134 N forces at 25 degrees of knee flexion.
- Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fischer's protected least significant difference post hoc test were used for statistical analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between trials (within installation) or between installations (within day).
- Significant day-to-day differences were observed for individual knee measurements but not for right-to-left knee differences.
- Ninety percent confidence limits for anterior/posterior translation at 89 N were +/- 1.5 mm (right), +/- 1.4 mm (left), and +/- 1.6 mm (differences).
- First-day measurements were significantly lower than subsequent days, indicating an adjustment period.
Conclusions:
- KT-1000 measurements demonstrate good reliability for paired differences between knees, suggesting this is a more robust metric.
- Reporting paired differences is recommended over individual knee measurements for standard KT-1000 evaluations.
- Follow-up examinations are advised to confirm initial translation values due to potential learning effects.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
09:02Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025