Related Experiment Videos
Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device
1Department of Medicine, Metropolitan Hospital-New York Medical College, New York.
Summary
Codeine phosphate shows potential as a positive control in allergy skin prick tests, but histamine phosphate offers more consistent results. Histamine provides a more reliable reference for grading allergen reactions like ragweed.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Dermatology
- Allergy Diagnostics
Background:
- Epicutaneous skin testing is a key diagnostic method for allergic conditions.
- Positive controls are essential for standardizing and interpreting skin prick test results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate codeine phosphate as a positive control in skin prick testing.
- To compare the reliability of codeine phosphate and histamine phosphate as positive controls.
- To assess their utility in grading reactions to allergens such as ragweed.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Multitest device for skin prick testing in 56 human subjects.
- Administered codeine phosphate (30 and 3 mg/mL) and histamine phosphate (2.75 mg/mL) as positive controls.
- Assessed wheal responses and sizes, and calculated relationships and variability.
Main Results:
- Histamine phosphate induced wheals in 52/56 subjects; codeine phosphate induced wheals in 39/56 and 30/56 subjects.
- Wheal sizes for codeine and histamine showed significant concordance.
- Histamine controls exhibited lower intersubject variability (44%) compared to codeine (64-65%).
- Grading ragweed reactions using allergen-to-control ratios differed between codeine and histamine.
Conclusions:
- Codeine phosphate demonstrates a concordant relationship with histamine in skin prick testing.
- Histamine phosphate provides a more consistent and reliable positive control due to lower variability.
- Findings suggest implications for the use of codeine phosphate as a positive control in allergy testing.