Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Optimal timing for intravascular administration set replacement
Amanda J Ullman1, Marie L Cooke, Donna Gillies
1NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4111.
Background:
The tubing (administration set) attached to both venous and arterial catheters may contribute to bacteraemia and other infections. The rate of infection may be increased or decreased by routine replacement of administration sets. This review was originally published in 2005 and was updated in 2012.
Objectives:
The objective of this review was to identify any relationship between the frequency with which administration sets are replaced and rates of microbial colonization, infection and death.
Search Methods:
We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2012), CINAHL (1982 to June 2012), EMBASE (1980 to June 2012), reference lists of identified trials and bibliographies of published reviews. The original search was performed in February 2004. We also contacted researchers in the field. We applied no language restriction.
Selection Criteria:
We included all randomized or controlled clinical trials on the frequency of venous or arterial catheter administration set replacement in hospitalized participants.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two review authors assessed all potentially relevant studies. We resolved disagreements between the two review authors by discussion with a third review author. We collected data for seven outcomes: catheter-related infection; infusate-related infection; infusate microbial colonization; catheter microbial colonization; all-cause bloodstream infection; mortality; and cost. We pooled results from studies that compared different frequencies of administration set replacement, for instance, we pooled studies that compared replacement ≥ every 96 hours versus every 72 hours with studies that compared replacement ≥ every 48 hours versus every 24 hours.
Main Results:
We identified 26 studies for this updated review, 10 of which we excluded; six did not fulfil the inclusion criteria and four did not report usable data. We extracted data from the remaining 18 references (16 studies) with 5001 participants: study designs included neonate and adult populations, arterial and venous administration sets, parenteral nutrition, lipid emulsions and crystalloid infusions. Most studies were at moderate to high risk of bias or did not adequately describe the methods that they used to minimize bias. All included trials were unable to blind personnel because of the nature of the intervention.No evidence was found for differences in catheter-related or infusate-related bacteraemia or fungaemia with more frequent administration set replacement overall or at any time interval comparison (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.69; RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.70). Infrequent administration set replacement reduced the rate of bloodstream infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98). No evidence revealed differences in catheter colonization or infusate colonization with more frequent administration set replacement (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.24; RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.86, respectively). Borderline evidence suggested that infrequent administration set replacement increased the mortality rate only within the neonatal population (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.36). No evidence revealed interactions between the (lack of) effects of frequency of administration set replacement and the subgroups analysed: parenteral nutrition and/or fat emulsions versus infusates not involving parenteral nutrition or fat emulsions; adult versus neonatal participants; and arterial versus venous catheters.
Authors' Conclusions:
Some evidence indicates that administration sets that do not contain lipids, blood or blood products may be left in place for intervals of up to 96 hours without increasing the risk of infection. Other evidence suggests that mortality increased within the neonatal population with infrequent administration set replacement. However, much the evidence obtained was derived from studies of low to moderate quality.
Insights
Replacing intravenous administration sets less frequently may reduce bloodstream infections. However, infrequent replacement may increase mortality in neonates. Evidence quality was generally low to moderate.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Catheter-associated infections, including bacteraemia, are a risk in hospitalized patients.
- The frequency of replacing administration sets may influence infection rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the relationship between administration set replacement frequency and microbial colonization, infection, and mortality rates.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and controlled clinical trials.
- Searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE) and included 16 studies with 5001 participants.
- Assessed outcomes including catheter-related infections, bloodstream infections, colonization, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Infrequent administration set replacement was associated with a reduced rate of bloodstream infections.
- No significant differences in catheter or infusate colonization were found.
- Increased mortality was observed in neonates with infrequent administration set replacement.
Conclusions:
- Administration sets without lipids, blood, or blood products may be safely used up to 96 hours.
- Infrequent replacement poses a mortality risk in neonates.
- Evidence quality from included studies was predominantly low to moderate.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
IV Infusion to Oral Dosing: Conversion Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
