Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Availability of Telehealth Services for Children at Mental Health Treatment Facilities.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

AI Chatbot Use and Disclosure for Mental Health Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

Structural Influences on Mental Health and Mental Health Care.

Harvard review of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Workforce and Staffing at 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline Centers.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Associations of endocrine disrupting chemicals with anogenital distance across infancy.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

US Child Mental Health Care Need, Unmet Needs, and Difficulty Accessing Services.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Assessing interchangeability at cluster levels with multiple-informant data.

Zhehui Luo1, Joshua Breslau, Joseph C Gardiner

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neighborhood social disorder impacts health, but informant data can be tricky. A new multilevel model separates individual and neighborhood effects, revealing that place impacts are often exaggerated due to personal differences.

Keywords:
interchangeabilitymultilevel modelsmultiple-informant dataneighborhood effects

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Social epidemiology
  • Statistical modeling
  • Public health research

Background:

  • Studies on neighborhood social disorder and health frequently use multiple informants.
  • A key assumption is the interchangeability of latent constructs from multi-informant data.
  • Current methods struggle to distinguish individual-level uncertainty from neighborhood-level uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel statistical model for analyzing multi-informant data in neighborhood health studies.
  • To accurately delineate uncertainty at individual and neighborhood levels.
  • To address limitations in existing methods for assessing neighborhood effects on health.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of a multilevel variance component factor model.
  • Utilizing data from a representative sample of children in Detroit and surrounding suburbs.
  • Comparing the proposed model with existing methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Informant-level models can overestimate neighborhood effects due to individual-level variations.
  • The proposed multilevel model effectively distinguishes between individual and neighborhood influences.
  • The new model provides a more accurate assessment of social disorder's impact on health.

Conclusions:

  • The multilevel variance component factor model is recommended for studies aggregating multi-informant data at the neighborhood level.
  • Accurate measurement of neighborhood effects requires models that account for individual differences.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of findings in social epidemiology and public health.