Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Comparison of low-dose aspirin and coronary vasodilators in acute unstable angina
M Vejar1, D Hackett, C Brunelli
1Cardiovascular Research Unit Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract:
Episodic platelet activation has been shown to occur in unstable angina, and aspirin should have an important therapeutic role in the management of these patients. The response to aspirin alone or to aspirin in combination with vasodilators such as heparin and beta-blockers has been assessed in 41 patients with unstable angina. Therapy was added sequentially in the event of recurrence of transient myocardial ischemia. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 (21 patients) received an intravenous infusion of isosorbide dinitrate and oral diltiazem, and group 2 (20 patients) received intravenous aspirin (60 mg the first day and 20 mg on successive days). This dose of aspirin reduced serum thromboxane B2 from 160 +/- 88 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) to undetectable values (less than 6 ng/ml, p less than 0.01). If episodes of ischemic ST segment shift continued, the therapy of group 1 was added to that of group 2 or vice versa; if further ST segment changes were documented, intravenous heparin and oral beta-blockers were added; if episodes of myocardial ischemia persisted, urgent coronary arteriography and myocardial revascularization were performed. Nine patients in group 1 and six in group 2 (p = 0.8) had no further episodes of myocardial ischemia on their initial therapy; 12 additional patients had no further episodes when taking combined therapy of aspirin and vasodilators. Thus, the administration of aspirin alone was not superior to coronary dilators; 30% of all patients continued to have episodes of myocardial ischemia or had a myocardial infarction develop when heparin and beta-blockers were added. Myocardial infarction occurred in one patient on vasodilator therapy alone, in two on combined therapy, and in two on full therapy. These results suggest that in some patients, the stimulus to coronary thrombosis and vasoconstriction occasionally becomes so strong that it cannot be inhibited by certain antagonist drugs. The unstable tendency to continuation of ischemia or evolution to myocardial infarction is not related to the severity of the persisting stenosis. Those patients not promptly responding to combined therapy immediately from admission should have early coronary angiography and aggressive treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

