Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Catheterization laboratory activation during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when should we say "No?"
Ankur Kalra1, Valmiki Maharaj, Ronald A Johannsen
1Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac arrest is a devastating manifestation of coronary artery disease and a leading cause of death in the western world. Early and effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential for return of spontaneous circulation. If manual compression is ongoing and return of spontaneous circulation has not been achieved, the prognosis is poor, and the logistics of performing cardiac catheterization are forbidding. With the advent of mechanical chest compression, however, this clinical scenario has become much more complex. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, although still cumbersome, has been established as feasible with ongoing mechanical chest compression. This article discusses the strengths and pitfalls of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, our experience, and current evidence behind activation of the catheterization laboratory with ongoing mechanical chest compression.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

