Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

09:08
Sample Preparation for Metabolic Profiling using MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging
Published on: December 22, 2020
Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics
Lloyd W Sumner1, Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett
1The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK, USA.
Metabolomics : Official Journal of the Metabolomic Society
|September 17, 2013
Summary
Standardized reporting of metabolomics data is crucial for reproducibility and data comparison. This article proposes minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis in metabolomics experiments.
Area of Science:
- Metabolomics
- Functional Genomics
- Scientific Data Reporting
Background:
- Standardized reporting of metadata is essential for large-scale functional genomics and metabolomics data.
- Consistent metadata reporting provides biological context, enables experimental replication, and facilitates data re-analysis.
- The Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) aims to establish consensus on minimum reporting standards for metabolomics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose minimum reporting standards for the chemical analysis component of metabolomics experiments.
- To address key areas including sample preparation, experimental analysis, quality control, metabolite identification, and data pre-processing.
- To focus initially on mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, common metabolomics techniques.
Main Methods:
- Community consensus building through the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI).
- Development of minimum reporting standards by the Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG).
- Focus on chemical analysis aspects relevant to metabolomics data generation.
Main Results:
- Proposal of minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis in metabolomics.
- Inclusion of standards for sample preparation, experimental analysis, quality control, metabolite identification, and data pre-processing.
- Emphasis on mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy, with openness to other techniques.
Conclusions:
- Standardized reporting is vital for the integrity and utility of metabolomics data.
- The proposed standards aim to improve the quality and comparability of metabolomics research.
- Community input is encouraged to refine and expand these reporting standards.

