Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is AI making us stupid?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Understanding the Usefulness of Self-Escape Technologies in Underground Mining: Perspectives of Metal/Nonmetal Miners.

Mining, metallurgy & exploration·2025
Same author

Judgments of effort and associated cues are influenced by stimulus context.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Does expecting external memory support cost recognition memory?

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Numerical comparison is spatial-Except when it is not.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Visual attention and the neuroimage bias.

D A Baker1, N J Schweitzer, Evan F Risko

  • 1School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Neuroimages may not bias laypeople's judgments, despite prior concerns. Eye tracking revealed attention differences, but no impact on legal decision-making, challenging the neuroimage bias theory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research suggests neuroimages can bias laypeople's judgments of scientific information.
  • This is a significant concern in legal settings where neuroimages might be used as evidence of mental state.
  • Conflicting studies exist, with some finding bias and others not finding independent effects of neuroimages on decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of neuroimages on laypeople's judgments.
  • To resolve conflicting findings regarding neuroimage bias.
  • To use eye tracking to measure attention to different neuroscientific data visualizations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed vignettes describing a court case with a potential neurological explanation for a defendant's actions.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

  • Visual stimuli included either an MRI image of the defendant's brain or a bar graph of brain activity.
  • Eye tracking technology measured attention distribution between the two visualization types.

    • Main Results:

    • Laypeople showed differential attention to neuroimagery compared to bar graphs.
    • This difference in attention did not lead to biased judgments.
    • No evidence supporting a neuroimage bias was found in this study.

    Conclusions:

    • While neuroimages capture attention, they do not necessarily bias laypeople's judgments in legal contexts.
    • The findings challenge the notion of a pervasive neuroimage bias.
    • Further research may explore the mechanisms underlying attention to neuroscientific data.