Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for the Real-driving Emissions (RDE) Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.
Farhan H Akhtar1, Robert W Pinder, Daniel H Loughlin
1National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
New energy policies can improve air quality and public health while mitigating climate change. The GLIMPSE model helps identify cost-effective strategies for these co-benefits.
Area of Science:
- Environmental science
- Public health
- Climate science
Background:
- Energy production technologies and policies significantly impact human health, ecosystems, and climate.
- Decision-making models are needed to assess techno-policy implications.
- The GLIMPSE framework offers insights into these complex interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and demonstrate the utility of the GLIMPSE decision model framework.
- To analyze future energy scenarios considering air quality regulations and CO2 emission reduction policies.
- To identify cost-effective strategies for achieving performance goals in air quality, health, and climate impacts.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the GLIMPSE decision model framework.
- Analyzed various future energy scenarios.
- Evaluated impacts under existing air quality regulations and potential CO2 emission reduction policies.
Main Results:
- Identified substantial co-benefits between climate change mitigation and health-based air quality improvements.
- Current public health-focused policies may increase near-term warming.
- Policies integrating greenhouse gas emission reductions can offset near-term warming and reduce long-term warming.
Conclusions:
- The GLIMPSE model effectively supports the identification of techno-policy futures with significant co-benefits.
- Integrating climate mitigation with air quality targets offers substantial advantages.
- Policy design is crucial for balancing near-term and long-term environmental and health outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Budgets
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Energy
Potential-Energy Criterion for Equilibrium
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Energy Basics