Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

09:21
A Ligated Intestinal Loop Model in Anesthetized Specific Pathogen Free Chickens to Study Clostridium Perfringens Virulence
Published on: October 11, 2018
Dissection of Koch's residual feed intake: implications for selection
Samuel E Aggrey1, Romdhane Rekaya
1NutriGenomics Laboratory, Department of Poultry Science, and.
Poultry Science
|September 19, 2013
Summary
Residual feed intake (RFI) was dissected into maintenance (RFIM) and growth (RFIG) components using a superior random effect model. RFIM offers a biological basis for selection, while RFIG does not, cautioning against its sole use.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Genetics
- Quantitative Biology
Background:
- Residual feed intake (RFI) is a proposed biological measure of feed utilization efficiency, but its components remain poorly understood.
- Traditional fixed effect models for RFI lack biological insight into its underlying mechanisms.
- Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is less biologically informative than RFI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To dissect residual feed intake (RFI) into its components: maintenance (RFIM) and growth (RFIG).
- To compare the predictive power of a novel random effect model against the traditional fixed effect model for RFI.
- To ascertain the heritability and genetic correlations of RFIM and RFIG.
Main Methods:
- A random effect model was developed to estimate RFIM and RFIG separately.
- The random effect model's performance was evaluated against a traditional fixed effect model using residual variance, R(2), and deviance information criterion.
- Heritability (h(2)) and genetic correlations were estimated for RFIM and RFIG.
Main Results:
- The random effect model significantly outperformed the fixed effect model in predicting RFI.
- Heritability for RFIM and RFIG was moderate (~0.50), with a highly negative genetic correlation (-0.95) between them.
- RFIM demonstrated a clear biological basis for selection, unlike RFIG.
Conclusions:
- The random effect model provides a superior, biologically relevant dissection of feed utilization efficiency.
- Selecting for RFIM can lead to smaller, more efficient animals by reducing maintenance requirements.
- RFIG is not a direct efficiency parameter and should not be used as the sole selection criterion; however, RFIM and RFIG offer flexibility for geneticists.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

