Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Lateralization

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From conflict to control: Responsiveness to food-related conflict predicts healthy eating.

Appetite·2026

Same author

Probing instructed but unnecessary switches of attentional strategy.

Psychological research·2025

Same author

Flexible processing of distractor stimuli under stress.

Scientific reports·2024

Same author

Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials.

Acta psychologica·2024

Same author

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.

Cognitive processing·2022

Same author

Dissociating selectivity adjustments from temporal learning-introducing the context-dependent proportion congruency effect.

PloS one·2022

Same journal

Role of AQP4 in ameliorating heat stress-induced cellular injury in a cell line model through active heat acclimation.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Correction: Cognitive state monitoring for neuroadaptive information visualization.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same journal

The synthetic self-hypothesis: dopaminergic redirection through self-face recognition in stuttering therapy.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same journal

A randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of <i>Ginkgo biloba</i> extract EGb 761<sup>®</sup> in cognitive impairment associated with post COVID-19 syndrome-the EGb COCOS protocol.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Examining the independent and combined effects of autistic and ADHD traits on multisensory integration.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Prediction of hormone receptor status in breast cancer brain metastases using an MRI-based multimodal deep learning framework.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: Problems and possible solutions.

Mark May¹, Mike Wendt

¹Spatial Cognition Research Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg, Germany.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

|September 19, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Visual perspective-taking tasks are crucial in psychology and neuroscience. Current research on these tasks is disputable, necessitating a re-evaluation of existing methods and alternative explanations for observed cognitive processes.

Keywords:

agency embodiment laterality tasks mental transformation own-body-transformation task spatial S-R compatibility spatial cognition visual perspective taking

More Related Videos

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Perspective taking is vital in psychological and neuroscientific research.
Visual perspective-taking tasks are commonly used, often involving own-body-transformation or avatar-in-scene paradigms.
Performance increases in latency or errors are typically attributed to observer-based perspective transformations.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically examine existing visual perspective-taking tasks.
To identify limitations and disputable assumptions within current methodologies.
To propose recommendations for future research in visual perspective taking.

Main Methods:

Review and analysis of established visual perspective-taking experimental paradigms.
Examination of the theoretical underpinnings of observer-based transformation accounts.
Consideration of alternative explanations, including object/array transformations and spatial conflict processing.

Main Results:

The prevalent interpretation of visual perspective-taking tasks, relying on observer-based transformations, is shown to be disputable.
Existing research has inadequately considered or ruled out alternative transformation and non-transformational accounts.
The reliance on laterality judgments in current tasks presents methodological challenges.

Conclusions:

Current visual perspective-taking tasks may not accurately capture the cognitive processes involved.
Alternative theoretical frameworks, such as object-based transformations or spatial conflict, warrant further investigation.
Future research should employ refined methodologies to better understand visual perspective-taking mechanisms.