Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Histological Quantification of Chronic Myocardial Infarct in Rats
Published on: December 11, 2016
ECG quantification of myocardial scar and risk stratification in MADIT-II
Zak Loring1, Wojciech Zareba, Scott McNitt
1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Insights
Electrocardiogram (ECG) QRS scoring did not predict sudden cardiac death (SCD) or heart failure (HF) death risk in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) showed benefit across all scar sizes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and heart failure (HF) mortality.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce SCD but not HF death.
- Improved patient selection for ICDs requires distinguishing risk for SCD versus non-SCD (HF death).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if electrocardiogram (ECG) quantification of myocardial infarction (MI) using Selvester QRS scoring can differentiate risk for SCD versus non-SCD.
- To assess the prognostic value of QRS scoring in predicting mortality and ventricular arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- Selvester QRS scoring was performed on 995 MADIT-II trial participants' ECGs to quantify MI size.
- Participants were categorized into small, medium, or large MI groups based on QRS score.
- Mortality, SCD, and non-SCD rates were analyzed in the conventional medical therapy (CMT) arm, and mortality and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) rates in the ICD arm, stratified by QRS score group.
Main Results:
- In the CMT arm, mortality, SCD, and non-SCD rates were similar across QRS score groups.
- In the ICD arm, mortality and VT/VF rates were also similar across QRS score groups.
- ICD implantation reduced mortality compared to CMT across all QRS score groups, with the greatest benefit observed in patients with large myocardial scars.
Conclusions:
- QRS score did not provide additional prognostic value for predicting SCD or non-SCD in the MADIT-II population with severe cardiac dysfunction.
- Previous studies showed QRS score predictive of VT/VF in a broader HF population, but findings may differ in populations with more severe LVEF reduction.
- Selvester QRS scoring may not be a reliable tool for risk stratification in MADIT-II eligible patients for ICD therapy.
Background:
Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases risk for both sudden cardiac death (SCD) and for heart failure (HF) death; however, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the incidence of SCD, not HF death. Distinguishing individuals at risk for HF death (non-SCD) versus SCD could improve ICD patient selection.
Objective:
This study evaluated whether electrocardiogram (ECG) quantification of myocardial infarction (MI) could discriminate risk for SCD versus non-SCD.
Methods:
Selvester QRS scoring was performed on 995 MADIT-II trial subjects' ECGs to quantify MI size. MIs were categorized as small (0-3 QRS points), medium (4-7) or large (≥ 8). Mortality, SCD and non-SCD rates in the conventional medical therapy (CMT) arm and mortality and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) rates in the ICD arm were analyzed by QRS score group. Both arms were analyzed to determine ICD efficacy by QRS score group.
Results:
In the CMT arm, mortality, SCD and non-SCD rates were similar across QRS score groups (P = 0.73, P = 0.92, and P = 0.77). The ICD arm showed similar rates of mortality (P = 0.17) and VT/VF (P = 0.24) across QRS score groups. ICD arm mortality was lower than CMT arm mortality across QRS score groups with greatest benefit in the large scar group.
Conclusion:
Recently, QRS score was shown to be predictive of VT/VF in the SCD-HeFT population consisting of both ischemic and nonischemic HF and having a maximum LVEF of 35% versus 30% for MADIT-II. Our study found that QRS score did not add prognostic value in the MADIT-II population exhibiting relatively more severe cardiac dysfunction.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
