Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
Published on: June 16, 2011
The effect of churn on "community viral load" in a well-defined regional population
Hartmut B Krentz1, M John Gill
1*Southern Alberta Clinic, Calgary, Canada; and †Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Insights
Community viral load (CVL) did not decrease with increased highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) use. Patient movement, or churn, limited CVL
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- HIV/AIDS Research
Background:
- Community viral load (CVL) quantifies transmissible HIV and monitors highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) impact.
- The influence of patient churn on CVL has not been previously investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of patient churn on community viral load (CVL) and its utility in assessing HAART effectiveness in reducing HIV transmission.
Main Methods:
- Annual CVL was calculated for the entire HIV population in southern Alberta (2001-2010).
- Subpopulation CVL was analyzed in 2009, categorizing patients by care status (continuous, newly diagnosed, new to region, moved away, returned, lost to follow-up).
- Viral load suppression was defined as <50 copies/mL (undetectable) and <200 copies/mL (suppressed).
Main Results:
- Despite increased HAART uptake (62% to 81%) and viral load suppression (49% to 72%), total CVL remained stable after 2003.
- New HIV diagnoses increased from 4.4 to 5.8 per 100,000 annually.
- In 2009, newly diagnosed patients and those with churn (transfers, lost to follow-up) contributed disproportionately to CVL (37.5% and 33%, respectively), while continuously cared-for patients (79%) contributed 29.5%.
Conclusions:
- Increased HAART coverage did not reduce CVL or new HIV diagnoses in this population.
- Patient churn significantly complicates the use of CVL as a metric for evaluating HAART's impact on HIV transmission reduction.
Background:
The concept of community viral load (CVL) was introduced to quantify the pool of transmissible HIV within a community and to monitor the potential impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on reducing new infections. The implications of churn (patient movement in/out of care in a community) on CVL have not been studied.
Methods:
The annual CVL was determined in the entire geographic HIV population receiving care in southern Alberta from 2001 to 2010; the CVL for specific subpopulations was analyzed for 2009. CVL was determined for patients under continuous care, newly diagnosed, new to the region, moved away, returned, and lost to follow-up (LTFU). Viral loads (VLs) <50 or <200 copies per milliliter were deemed undetectable and suppressed, respectively. The mean VL per patient and total VL were used to determine CVL.
Results:
From 2001 to 2010, the HAART uptake for all patients increased from 62% to 81%, undetectability from 32% to 66%, and suppression from 49% to 72%. The annual total CVL however did not vary significantly after 2003. Incidence rates for new locally diagnosed infections increased from 4.4 to 5.8/100,000 per year. In 2009, newly diagnosed HIV patients (6.6%) contributed 37.5% to the CVL, whereas patients transferring in/out of the region or lost to follow-up contributed 33% to the CVL. Patients in continuous care (79% of all patients) contributed 29.5% to the total CVL.
Conclusions:
Increasing HAART coverage did not reduce the CVL or reduce new HIV diagnoses in our population. The effect of churn significantly limited CVL use as a measure for evaluating the impact of HAART in reducing HIV transmissions in our population.
Related Concept Videos
Viral Recombination
Methods to Assess Microbial Populations
Viral Mutations
Human Virome
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities

