Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Trait Centrality01:21

Trait Centrality

Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hierarchy and ranking in fencing and tennis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The desire to avoid cognitive dissonance drives community formation in a social network model.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Long-term tracking of social structure in groups of rats.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

3D cell segregation geometry and dynamics are governed by tissue surface tension regulation.

Communications biology·2023
Same author

Opinion Polarization in Human Communities Can Emerge as a Natural Consequence of Beliefs Being Interrelated.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments.

Science robotics·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution.

Anna Zafeiris1, Tamás Vicsek

  • 1Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1A, Budapest H-1117, Hungary.

Nature Communications
|September 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new model for group decision-making, revealing that optimal group composition requires a skewed distribution of member competences. This approach enhances collective problem-solving for both human and robotic groups.

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Computational Social Science
  • Collective Intelligence
  • Decision Theory

Background:

  • Collective decision-making is crucial for groups (human or robotic) to solve problems like resource allocation.
  • Existing research often assumes hierarchical input relevance but lacks a quantitative, generic model for its origins and benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a generic, quantitative model for understanding optimal group composition in collective decision-making.
  • To identify the ideal distribution of competences and flexibility within a group for enhanced problem-solving.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a family of models based on general features of group decision-making.
  • Optimization of group compositions by analyzing competence and flexibility/pliancy distributions.
  • Mathematical analysis to determine optimal competence distributions.

Main Results:

  • The optimal distribution of competences within a group is a highly skewed function.
  • A structured 'fat tail' characterizes the optimal competence distribution.
  • Group performance is enhanced by optimizing both competence and flexibility distributions.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a quantitative framework for understanding optimal group structures.
  • Findings can guide the formation of effective human and robotic teams for complex tasks.
  • Demonstrates the advantages of a skewed competence distribution for collective problem-solving.