Modernizing the nonhomologous end-joining repertoire: alternative and classical NHEJ share the stage

Ludovic Deriano1, David B Roth

  • 1Departments of Immunology and Genomes & Genetics, Institut Pasteur, CNRS-URA 1961, 75015 Paris, France;

Annual Review of Genetics
|September 21, 2013
PubMed

Insights

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) threaten genomic integrity. This review details classical nonhomologous end-joining (cNHEJ), alternative NHEJ (aNHEJ), and homologous recombination (HR) pathways, crucial for DNA repair and preventing cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are critical DNA lesions impacting genomic stability.
  • DSB misrepair, particularly via nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), can lead to oncogenic transformation and genome scrambling.
  • Canonical repair pathways include homologous recombination (HR) and classical NHEJ (cNHEJ).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the mechanisms of cNHEJ and alternative NHEJ (aNHEJ) pathways.
  • To explore the interplay between these DSB repair pathways and the DNA damage response (DDR).
  • To discuss the regulatory mechanisms governing DSB repair pathway choice and clinical applications of NHEJ inhibitors.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of mechanisms governing DSB repair.
  • Analysis of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways.
  • Review of clinical applications and inhibitors targeting NHEJ.

Main Results:

  • Identified alternative NHEJ (aNHEJ) as a distinct, error-prone pathway operating alongside cNHEJ.
  • Highlighted aNHEJ's role in catalyzing genome rearrangements and oncogenic transformation.
  • Detailed the DDR's influence on selecting between HR, cNHEJ, and aNHEJ for DSB repair.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding cNHEJ and aNHEJ mechanisms is vital for comprehending genome stability and disease.
  • The DDR orchestrates the choice of DSB repair pathway, impacting cellular fate.
  • Targeting NHEJ pathways offers potential therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.

Related Concept Videos

Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:38

Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are: