Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A scoping review of guidance on sharing trial results with patients and the public finds inconsistent recommendations and limited methodological development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Same author

CRT-Estimands Framework: consensus based extension of the ICH E9(R1) addendum for cluster randomised trials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same author

Development and implementation of a child-specific dynamic stretching exercise programme for ambulant children with spastic cerebral palsy: The SPELL trial.

Physiotherapy·2026

Same author

Reporting Completeness of Systematic Reviews of Nutrition or Diet-Related Randomised Controlled Trials: A Meta-Research on Adherence to PRISMA Items.

Nutrition reviews·2026

Same author

Development of a set of core outcome measures for ambulant children with cerebral palsy after lower limb orthopaedic surgery.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2025

Same journal

Outcomes in offspring of interventions to treat substance use in pregnancy: protocol for an umbrella review.

Systematic reviews·2026

Same journal

Association of inflammatory fluid biomarkers with the progression of Alzheimer's disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematic reviews·2026

Same journal

Environmental moderators of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in mental health: a systematic review protocol.

Systematic reviews·2026

Same journal

Defining interstitial lung disease related to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review protocol of the Myositis Clinical Trial Consortium (MCTC).

Systematic reviews·2026

Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health information needs of young adults with chronic conditions: a scoping review protocol.

Systematic reviews·2026

Same journal

A critical systematic review of the impact of sedentarism and physical inactivity on the cognitive performance of children.

Systematic reviews·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods.

Jackie Chandler¹, Sally Hopewell

¹The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK. jchandler@cochrane.org.

Systematic Reviews

|September 21, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Cochrane Collaboration, celebrating 20 years, pioneered systematic review methods for synthesizing healthcare intervention evidence. This special issue details their methods development and future directions in evidence synthesis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

Health Research Methods
Evidence Synthesis
Systematic Reviews

Background:

The Cochrane Collaboration has significantly influenced scientific methodology over two decades.
Systematic reviews are crucial for synthesizing research evidence, particularly from randomized trials.
The focus is on answering questions regarding the effects of healthcare interventions.

Observation:

This special issue presents a series of articles detailing the evolution of systematic review methods within The Cochrane Collaboration.
The development of review methods by the Collaboration has been extensive and profound.
The impact of Cochrane Review methodologies on the field of evidence synthesis is discussed.

Findings:

The Cochrane Collaboration's methods have been pivotal in advancing systematic reviewing.
The series explores the historical development and impact of these evidence synthesis techniques.
The breadth and depth of methods development within the Collaboration are highlighted.

Implications:

Understanding the development of Cochrane Review methods provides insight into best practices for evidence synthesis.
The discussion acknowledges the Collaboration's contribution within the broader field of evidence synthesis.
Future directions for the evolution of systematic review methods are considered for Cochrane Reviews.