Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
The impact of growth curve changes in assessing premature infant growth
M Rabner1, J Meurling2, C Ahlberg2
11] Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA [2] Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
The choice of growth chart significantly impacts the assessment of premature infant growth. Different charts, like the WHO standard versus the Infant Health Development Program (IHDP) reference, can alter classifications of underweight status in preterm infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Neonatology
- Growth Monitoring
Background:
- Premature infants require specialized growth monitoring post-discharge.
- Existing growth references may not accurately reflect preterm infant growth trajectories.
- The World Health Organization (WHO) growth standard and the Infant Health Development Program (IHDP) reference offer different benchmarks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of the WHO growth standard versus the IHDP growth reference on interpreting the growth of premature infants after hospital discharge.
- To assess how these different growth curves affect the classification of preterm infants at the extremes of growth (e.g., <5th or ≥95th percentile).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study of 2297 infants born at ≤35 weeks gestational age.
- Comparison of growth classifications using WHO and IHDP growth curves via Kappa statistics.
- Logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with growth curve disagreement.
Main Results:
- Moderate agreement (κ=0.40-0.52) was observed between WHO and IHDP growth curves.
- Disagreements occurred in 8.3% for weight and 13.6% for length, with the WHO curve classifying more infants as <5th percentile.
- The IHDP curve identified more infants below the 5th percentile for head circumference.
- Lower gestational age (<30 weeks) was linked to growth curve disagreement for weight and length extremes.
Conclusions:
- The selection of a growth curve significantly influences the assessment of premature infant growth and underweight classification.
- Further longitudinal research is necessary to determine which growth assessment tool best identifies preterm infants at risk for long-term growth issues.
Objective:
To assess the impact of using the recently published WHO growth standard, based on healthy, breastfed infants in multiple countries that excluded prematurely born infants, versus the Infant Health Development Program (IHDP) growth reference constructed from premature infants, on the interpretation of the growth of premature infants after hospital discharge.
Study Design:
A retrospective cohort was constructed of infants born at gestational age ≤35 weeks who initially presented for care at one of the 32 outpatient sites between 2006 and 2008 (N=2297). Kappa statistics measured overall agreement and agreement in ever classifying infants <5th percentile or ≥ 95th percentile for age between the WHO and IHDP. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with growth curve disagreement in classifying infants at the extremes of growth.
Result:
The WHO and IHDP growth curves showed moderate agreement for all measurements (κ=0.40-0.52). When the curves disagreed on whether an infant was <5th percentile for weight (8.3% of cohort) or length (13.6% of cohort), the WHO curve classified the infant in this category over 90% of the time. For head circumference, the IHDP curve classified more infants below the 5th percentile. Gestational age <30 weeks was associated with growth curve disagreement for weight and length <5th percentile.
Conclusion:
Choice of growth curve affects the assessment of growth and the classification of underweight status. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine which assessment identifies the greatest number of premature infants at risk for long-term growth issues.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Growth Curve
Population Growth
Exponential Equations for Modeling Growth
Nature and Nurture
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
