Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Consideration of ICD-9 code-derived disease-specific safety indicators in CKD
Iris R Hartley1, Jennifer S Ginsberg, Clarissa J Diamantidis
1Departments of Medicine and, †Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine and, ‡Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, §Fairleigh Dickinson University, Pharmacy Practice Division, School of Pharmacy, Florham Park, New Jersey.
New patient safety indicators for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are more common in CKD patients and distinct from existing Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality indicators. These CKD indicators can help identify patients needing further safety event evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Patient Safety
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Existing patient safety indicators do not adequately capture adverse events specific to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).
- There is a need for specialized indicators to monitor safety in hospitalized CKD patients.
- This study evaluates candidate CKD-specific patient safety indicators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and compare novel CKD-pertinent patient safety indicators with existing Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicators.
- To assess the prevalence and distinctness of CKD patient safety indicators in hospitalized patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 247,160 hospitalized veterans from the Veterans Health Administration (2005).
- Comparison of CKD patient safety indicators (acute kidney failure, heart failure, electrolyte disturbances, medication errors) against AHRQ indicators using ICD-9 codes.
- Patients with prehospital estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m² (CKD group) were compared to a non-CKD group.
Main Results:
- CKD patient safety indicators were generally more common than AHRQ indicators and occurred in different patient populations.
- CKD indicators were more prevalent in the CKD group compared to the non-CKD group, with exceptions for certain electrolyte disturbances.
- The adjusted composite CKD patient safety indicator rate was significantly higher in the CKD group (398.0) versus the non-CKD group (250.0).
Conclusions:
- Candidate CKD patient safety indicators are distinct from AHRQ indicators and more prevalent in CKD patients.
- These novel indicators show potential as tools to identify hospitalized CKD patients requiring closer monitoring for disease-specific safety events.
- Developing and implementing CKD-specific safety indicators is crucial for improving care quality and patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction