Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy operative time
Stacey C Carter1, Stuart Lipsitz, Ya-Chen T Shih
1Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
BJU International
|September 24, 2013
Summary
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) operative times significantly decreased, while retropubic RP (RRP) times remained stable. Higher surgeon volume reduces operative time, offering substantial cost savings.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Operative time is a critical metric for assessing surgeon proficiency and quality of care in radical prostatectomy (RP).
- Understanding factors influencing operative times is essential for optimizing surgical training and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify patient, surgeon, and hospital-related factors affecting operative times for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).
- To analyze trends in operative times for RARP and RRP over a defined study period.
Main Methods:
- A population-based observational cohort study utilized SEER-Medicare linked data from 2003-2009.
- Included 3458 men undergoing RARP and 6993 men undergoing RRP for prostate cancer.
- Median regression analysis was employed to assess factors influencing operative times.
Main Results:
- Median RARP operative time decreased by 68 minutes (315 to 247 min) from 2003 to 2008-2009 (P < 0.001), while RRP times remained constant (195 vs 197 min, P = 0.90).
- RARP was associated with longer operative times compared to RRP (PE 70.9, P < 0.001).
- Higher surgeon volume correlated with shorter operative times (P < 0.001), while obesity increased operative time (PE 15, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- RARP operative times significantly improved during the study period, whereas RRP times showed no change.
- Increased surgeon volume is a key factor in reducing operative time, potentially leading to substantial annual cost savings of nearly $15 million.
- Optimizing surgeon volume and efficiency could enhance resource utilization in prostatectomy procedures.
