Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Oral cephalosporins in perspective
1Division of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
Abstract:
Oral cephalosporins, after 25 years of use, continue to present the clinician with a therapeutic challenge. The older agents have been extensively prescribed for ambulatory adult and pediatric patients with a wide variety of infections caused by gram-positive and some gram-negative organisms. The newer agents, cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, and cefixime, have increased in vitro activity against beta-lactamase-secreting strains of Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis which has made them more popular for the treatment of otitis media and respiratory tract infections in children. The new agents are also more active against most gram-negative organisms. However, clinical trials have failed to show a clear-cut superiority over older, proven therapy when used to treat infections of the respiratory tract, middle ear, skin and soft tissue, urinary tract, and bone and joints when caused by sensitive organisms. Published reports of clinical trials continue to support the recommendation that oral cephalosporins, especially the newer and more expensive agents, be reserved for second- or third-line therapy when amoxicillin, penicillin V, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole have either failed or produced patient intolerance. Erythromycin/sulfisoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium are equally efficacious and also less expensive than cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, and cefixime and could be considered second-line therapy prior to the use of the newer cephalosporins for infections in the ambulatory patient.
Insights
Oral cephalosporins offer limited advantages over older antibiotics for common infections. Newer agents are not clearly superior, suggesting they should be reserved for treatment failures or intolerance to first-line options.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Oral cephalosporins have been used for 25 years to treat various infections.
- Newer agents show increased in vitro activity against specific bacteria like Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis.
- These newer agents are often prescribed for pediatric otitis media and respiratory tract infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of newer oral cephalosporins compared to older therapies.
- To determine the optimal role of oral cephalosporins in ambulatory patient infections.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness and therapeutic positioning of different oral antibiotic classes.
Main Methods:
- Review of published clinical trials comparing oral cephalosporins with other antibiotics.
- Analysis of in vitro activity data against common respiratory and skin pathogens.
- Evaluation of treatment outcomes for infections of the respiratory tract, middle ear, skin, urinary tract, and musculoskeletal system.
Main Results:
- Clinical trials have not demonstrated clear superiority of newer oral cephalosporins over older treatments for common infections.
- Newer cephalosporins (cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, cefixime) exhibit enhanced activity against beta-lactamase-producing H. influenzae and B. catarrhalis.
- Efficacy of newer cephalosporins is comparable to older agents when treating infections caused by susceptible organisms.
Conclusions:
- Oral cephalosporins, particularly newer agents, should be reserved for second- or third-line therapy.
- Reserve use is recommended when first-line agents like amoxicillin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole fail or cause intolerance.
- Less expensive and equally efficacious alternatives like erythromycin/sulfisoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium exist for second-line treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

