The association of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Astero Klabatsa1, Sugama Chicklore, Sally F Barrington

  • 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Abstract

Insights

Functional imaging with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) shows promise for predicting survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Parameters like metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are associated with patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Nuclear Medicine

Background:

  • Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatments.
  • Patient survival varies significantly, highlighting the need for better prognostic tools.
  • Risk stratification is crucial for managing MPM patients and for clinical trial design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic capability of parameters derived from baseline 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in MPM patients.
  • To assess the association between metabolic activity measured by FDG PET/CT and patient survival.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 60 MPM patients' baseline FDG PET/CT scans for pretreatment staging.
  • Measurement of standardized uptake values (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG).
  • Correlation of PET/CT parameters with overall survival (OS) and histological subtypes.

Main Results:

  • Histological subtype, TLG, and MTV were significantly associated with OS in univariable analysis.
  • SUVmax showed a borderline association with OS.
  • On multivariable analysis, histological subtype and TLG demonstrated borderline associations with OS.

Conclusions:

  • FDG PET/CT parameters incorporating functional tumor volume (MTV, TLG) are significantly associated with survival in MPM.
  • These functional imaging parameters warrant further investigation for their utility in stratifying patients within clinical trials.
  • No significant differences in PET parameters were observed between epithelioid and non-epithelioid MPM subtypes.

Related Concept Videos