Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
[Perioperative nutrition support for esophageal cancer complicated with diabetes mellitus]
Shuo-yan Liu1, Xiao-feng Chen, Feng Wang
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350014, China. 39859870@qq.com.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy between perioperative enteral and parenteral nutrition support for esophageal cancer patients complicated with diabetes mellitus.
Methods:
Thirty esophageal cancer patients complicated with diabetes mellitus between September and November 2012 were prospectively enrolled in this trial. According to random number table, 30 cases were randomly divided into enteral group (n=15) and parenteral group (n=15). During the period between 3 days before operation and 8 days after operation, patients received enteral nutrition (AnSure) and parenteral nutrition support respectively. The daily dynamic monitoring of blood glucose was performed. Nutritional indexes (albumin and prealbumin) were evaluated 1-day before operation and 8-day after operation. Postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function and complications associated with nutritional support were observed. The cost of nutritional support was calculated.
Results:
Patients in the two groups achieved satisfactory perioperative blood glucose control. Finger tip blood glucose was 5.0-9.0 mmol/L before meal, 7.0-10.0 mmol/L 2-hour after meal, and 4.0-8.0 mmol/L at 10 PM and 3 AM. No hypoglycemia (<3.5 mmol/L) was found in all the patients. The time to first flatus after surgery was (62.4±15.7) in the enteral group, significantly earlier than (90.8±22.4) h in the parenteral group (P<0.01). Postoperative nutritional indices and associated complications were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). Cost in the enteral group was significantly lower than that in the parenteral group [(650.8±45.8) RMB vs. (3016.5±152.6) RMB, P<0.01].
Conclusion:
Perioperative nutrition support can effectively control blood glucose and improve perioperative nutritional status simultaneously for esophageal cancer patients with diabetes mellitus. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition can accelerate the recovery of gastric bowel function and reduce the cost of nutritional support.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease