Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
The safety netting behaviour of first contact clinicians: a qualitative study
Caroline H D Jones1, Sarah Neill, Monica Lakhanpaul
1Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, OX2 6GG Oxford, England. caroline.jones@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Insights
Clinicians inconsistently provide safety netting advice to parents of acutely ill children. Training and structural changes are needed to ensure consistent and effective communication for better child safety.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric emergency medicine
- Qualitative research methods
- Healthcare communication
Background:
- Distinguishing serious illness in children is challenging for healthcare professionals.
- Safety netting advice is recommended for parents of acutely sick children but its provision is poorly understood.
- Understanding how and when safety netting advice is given is crucial for improving child healthcare outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the safety netting advice provided by first contact clinicians to parents of acutely sick young children.
- To explore the methods, timing, and rationale behind safety netting advice delivery.
- To identify barriers and facilitators in the provision of safety netting advice.
Main Methods:
- A qualitative study involving interviews and focus groups with doctors and nurses.
- Participants were recruited from general practice, emergency departments, and out-of-hours services.
- Data analysis employed the method of constant comparison.
Main Results:
- Safety netting advice content varied, with inconsistent verbal and written delivery methods.
- Clinicians reported no specific training in safety netting and rarely documented its provision.
- Factors influencing provision included clinician experience, confidence, time, knowledge, and parental characteristics.
Conclusions:
- Inconsistencies in safety netting provision exist within and between healthcare organizations.
- Structural changes, clinician training, and improved documentation are recommended to enhance safety netting.
- Further research is needed to determine optimal safety netting advice components for consistent and effective delivery.
Background:
Acute illness is common in childhood, and it is difficult for healthcare professionals to distinguish seriously ill children from the vast majority with minor or self-limiting illnesses. Safety netting provides parents with advice on when and where to return if their child deteriorates, and it is widely recommended that parents of acutely sick young children should be given safety netting advice. Yet little is known about how and when this is given. We aimed to understand what safety netting advice first contact clinicians give parents of acutely sick young children, how, when, and why.
Methods:
This was a qualitative study. Interviews and focus groups were held with doctors and nurses in a general practice surgery, a District General Hospital emergency department, a paediatric emergency department, and an out-of-hours service. Data were analysed using the method of constant comparison.
Results:
Sixteen clinicians participated. They described that safety netting advice includes advising parents what to look for, when and where to seek help. How safety netting was delivered and whether it was verbal or written was inconsistent, and no participants described being trained in this area. Safety netting appeared to be rarely documented, and was left to individual preference. Limitations of written materials, and structural barriers to the provision of safety netting, were perceived. Participants described that safety netting was influenced by clinicians' experience, confidence, time and knowledge; and perceived parental anxiety, experience, and competence. Participants noted several limitations to safety netting including not knowing if it has been understood by parents or been effective; parental difficulty interpreting information and desire for face-to-face reassurance; and potential over-reassurance.
Conclusion:
First contact clinicians employ a range of safety netting techniques, with inconsistencies within and between organisations. Structural changes, clinician training, and documentation in patient notes may improve safety netting provision. Research is needed into the optimal components of safety netting advice so that clinicians can consistently deliver the most effective advice for parents.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Naturalistic Observations
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
