Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026
06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Measuring four perspectives of justice sensitivity with two items each
Anna Baumert1, Constanze Beierlein, Manfred Schmitt
1a Department of Psychology , University of Koblenz-Landau , Germany.
Journal of Personality Assessment
|September 27, 2013
Summary
This study introduces brief scales to measure justice sensitivity from four viewpoints. These validated scales efficiently assess individual differences in reactions to injustice, impacting well-being and health.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Individual Differences
Background:
- Individual differences in vulnerability to injustice are well-documented.
- Measuring justice sensitivity across various roles (victim, observer, beneficiary, perpetrator) is crucial for understanding these differences.
- Existing measures may be lengthy, limiting their widespread use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate brief, two-item scales for measuring justice sensitivity.
- To assess justice sensitivity from four distinct perspectives: victim, observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator.
- To provide an efficient instrument for future research on individual differences in injustice experiences.
Main Methods:
- Development of two-item scales for justice sensitivity.
- Latent state-trait analysis to establish factorial validity and reliability in Study 1 (German adults).
- Measurement invariance testing using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (large random sample) comparing short and original scales.
Main Results:
- The two-item scales demonstrated factorial validity and high reliability.
- Measurement invariance was confirmed, showing the scales' consistency across item contexts.
- Correlations with personality traits and life satisfaction supported the scales' convergent and discriminant validity.
Conclusions:
- The developed two-item scales offer a valid and efficient method for measuring justice sensitivity.
- These scales facilitate future research into how individual differences in justice sensitivity influence well-being and health.
- The findings underscore the importance of considering multiple perspectives when assessing reactions to injustice.
Related Concept Videos
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
02:34Empathy
Some researchers suggest that altruism operates on empathy. Empathy is the capacity to understand another person’s perspective, to feel what he or she feels. An empathetic person makes an emotional connection with others and feels compelled to help (Batson, 1991). Empathy can be expressed in several ways, including cognitive, affective, and motor.
01:29Measures of Intelligence
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
01:26Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
01:24Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...