Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
10:09

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models

Published on: October 9, 2014

Comparative clinical study on deformity correction accuracy of different external fixators.

Ilker Eren1, Levent Eralp, Mehmet Kocaoglu

  • 1Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Erzurum Area Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum Bolge Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Palandoken, Erzurum, Turkey, ilker.eren@gmail.com.

International Orthopaedics
|September 27, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The Smart Correction fixator offers higher accuracy in correcting bone deformities compared to Ilizarov external fixators, especially for complex cases. This leads to lower residual deformity after treatment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Nail-to-bicondylar ratio, but not CPAK classification, is associated with arthrosis and deformity progression after retrograde fixator-assisted nailing for distal femoral deformity in metabolic bone disease" [The Knee 62 (2026) 104520].

The Knee·2026
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of Level-Specific Fusion Outcomes and Scapular Positioning in Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2026
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Does retrograde entry in femoral lengthening over nail allow greater lengthening without increasing complications? A single-surgeon cohort study.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same author

Nail-to-bicondylar ratio, but not CPAK classification, is associated with arthrosis and deformity progression after retrograde fixator-assisted nailing for distal femoral deformity in metabolic bone disease.

The Knee·2026
Same author

Complications of PI to PIII hemipelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Skeletal reconstruction

Background:

  • External fixation devices are crucial for treating complex bone deformities.
  • Comparing the efficacy of different external fixator systems is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
  • The Ilizarov fixator is a traditional standard, while newer devices like Smart Correction aim to improve accuracy and ease of use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the correction accuracy of Smart Correction spatial fixators versus Ilizarov-type external fixators.
  • To evaluate the impact of deformity complexity on the performance of each fixator type.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective comparison of 77 bone segments treated with Smart Correction and 94 segments treated with Ilizarov fixators.
  • Patients were categorized by limb lengthening and the number of deformity planes (1-3 planes).

More Related Videos

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
08:20

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator

Published on: March 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
10:09

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models

Published on: October 9, 2014

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
08:20

A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator

Published on: March 24, 2019

  • Correction duration, bone healing index, and residual deformity were assessed for each group.

    • Main Results:

    • Smart Correction devices had a shorter correction period (49.05 days) than Ilizarov fixators (66.53 days).
    • The Ilizarov group showed a significantly better bone healing index.
    • Smart Correction resulted in significantly lower residual deformity, with accuracy increasing with deformity complexity.

    Conclusions:

    • The Smart Correction fixator demonstrates superior accuracy in correcting bone deformities compared to the Ilizarov external fixator.
    • The device is accurate, easy to apply, and plan.
    • The accuracy advantage of Smart Correction becomes more pronounced with increasing deformity complexity.