Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a self-determination theory-informed coaching framework for the transition to residency.

International journal of medical education·2026
Same author

Launch, Learn, Pivot, and Scale: Evolution of the Medical Innovators Development Program.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same author

Modeling lifelong learning: exploring clinical teachers' skill development through the master adaptive learner lens.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Fostering Lifelong Learning: Integrating a Portfolio Coaching Program into an Undergraduate Medical Education (UME) Competency-Based Curriculum.

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

Measuring the Master Adaptive Learner: Development and validity evidence for a revised instrument.

Medical teacher·2025
Same author

Not a Benign (Mis)Label: Penicillin Allergy Education for the Nonallergist.

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Educational strategies for improving clinical reasoning.

William B Cutrer1, William M Sullivan, Amy E Fleming

  • 1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, 2200 Children's Way, 5121 Doctor's Office Tower, Nashville, TN 37232.

Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care
|September 28, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study explores clinical reasoning in physicians, identifying four common error sources: knowledge gaps, data gathering issues, processing flaws, and metacognition deficits. It offers strategies to enhance medical education and physician diagnostic skills.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Cognitive Science
  • Physician Training

Background:

  • Clinical reasoning is essential for physicians across all specialties.
  • Developing effective clinical reasoning in trainees is a core medical education goal.
  • Teaching clinical reasoning presents significant challenges for practicing physicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance understanding of cognitive processes in physician clinical reasoning.
  • To guide the development of effective reasoning skills in medical learners.
  • To maximize educational efforts by linking reasoning assessment with improvement strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzing the cognitive processes underlying clinical reasoning.
  • Identifying common sources of clinical reasoning errors in physicians and trainees.
  • Discussing educational strategies tailored to specific reasoning deficits.

Main Results:

  • Clinical reasoning errors stem from inadequate knowledge, faulty data gathering, flawed data processing, or poor metacognition.
  • Educators should pinpoint where learners' reasoning breaks down.
  • Targeted strategies can address struggles in knowledge acquisition, data gathering, data processing, and metacognition.

Conclusions:

  • A deeper understanding of clinical reasoning's cognitive basis is fundamental for medical education.
  • Educational strategies should address the four identified domains of reasoning errors.
  • Providing physicians with a diverse toolbox of techniques will improve learner reasoning abilities.