Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Limbal Approach-Subretinal Injection of Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy in Mice Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Published on: August 7, 2015
"Is a cure in my sight?" Multi-stakeholder perspectives on phase I choroideremia gene transfer clinical trials
Shelly Benjaminy1, Ian Macdonald2, Tania Bubela1
1School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Purpose:
Ocular gene transfer clinical trials are raising patient hopes for the treatment of choroideremia--a blinding degenerative retinopathy. Phase I choroideremia gene transfer trials necessitate communicating about the risks of harm and potential benefits with patients while avoiding the sensationalism that has historically undermined this field of translational medicine.
Methods:
We conducted interviews between June 2011 and June 2012 with 6 choroideremia patient advocates, 20 patients, and 15 clinicians about their hopes for benefits, perceived risks of harm, and hopes for the time frame of clinical implementation of choroideremia gene transfer.
Results:
Despite the safety focus of phase I trials, participants hoped for direct visual benefits with evident discrepancies between stakeholder perspectives about the degree of visual benefit. Clinicians and patient advocates were concerned by limited patient attention to risks of harm. Interviews revealed confusion about the time frames for the clinical implementation of choroideremia gene transfer and patient urgency to access gene transfer within a limited therapeutic window.
Conclusion:
Differences in stakeholder perspectives about choroideremia gene transfer necessitate strategies that promote responsible communications about choroideremia gene transfer and aid in its translation. Strategies should counter historical sensationalism associated with gene transfer, promote informed consent, and honor patient hope while grounding communications in current clinical realities.
Insights
Patient hopes for ocular gene transfer in choroideremia (a blinding retinopathy) trials differ from clinical realities. Responsible communication is crucial to manage expectations and ensure informed consent for this gene therapy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Genetics
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Choroideremia is a blinding degenerative retinopathy.
- Ocular gene transfer trials offer hope for choroideremia treatment.
- Phase I trials require careful communication of risks and benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore stakeholder perspectives on ocular gene transfer for choroideremia.
- To understand hopes for benefits, perceived risks, and implementation timelines.
- To identify communication challenges in gene transfer trials.
Main Methods:
- Interviews conducted with choroideremia patient advocates, patients, and clinicians.
- Explored hopes for benefits, perceived risks, and implementation time frames.
- Data collected between June 2011 and June 2012.
Main Results:
- Participants desired direct visual benefits, with differing views on the extent of improvement.
- Clinicians and advocates noted patient underestimation of risks.
- Confusion existed regarding gene transfer timelines and patient urgency.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies in stakeholder views necessitate improved communication strategies for ocular gene transfer.
- Responsible communication should counter sensationalism and promote informed consent.
- Balancing patient hope with clinical realities is essential for successful translation.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy
Clinical Trials: Overview
iPS Cell Differentiation
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...

