Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The interview in the admission process.

J C Edwards1, E K Johnson, J B Molidor

  • 1Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri 63104.

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: A synopsis of global frontiers in fertility preservation.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2022
Same author

A synopsis of global frontiers in fertility preservation.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2022
Same author

Introducing BITTSy: The Behavioral Infant & Toddler Testing System.

Behavior research methods·2021
Same author

Federal research funding and academic productivity in pediatric urology: from early career to research independence.

Journal of pediatric urology·2019
Same author

Attitudes toward 'Disorders of Sex Development' nomenclature among physicians, genetic counselors, and mental health clinicians.

Journal of pediatric urology·2018
Same author

Urinary tract infection after voiding cystourethrogram.

Journal of pediatric urology·2017
Same journal

Ten-year outcomes from the Columbia-Bassett program: a model for strengthening the underserved health workforce.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence teaching assistants: a scalable solution for supporting struggling medical students.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

MDCU MedUMORE: a national digital platform for equitable and lifelong medical education in Thailand and beyond.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

The Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program: A Model for Increasing Diversity in Surgical Specialties.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Toward a global ecosystem for health professions education: harnessing open educational resources and generative AI with shared governance.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
See all related articles

Medical school selection interviews are crucial for gathering information and recruitment. Structuring interviews enhances reliability and validity, while interviewer training can mitigate bias in the admissions process.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Admissions Processes
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Medical schools are critically reviewing admissions procedures due to demographic, legal, and educational shifts.
  • The selection interview is a key component of medical school admissions, though its effectiveness is debated.
  • Interviews serve multiple purposes including information gathering, decision making, data verification, and recruitment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the role and effectiveness of the selection interview in medical school admissions.
  • To explore the purposes of interviews, particularly information gathering and recruitment, in light of declining applicant interest.
  • To examine the impact of interview structure and interviewer bias on the reliability and validity of admissions decisions.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of the purposes and methodologies of medical school selection interviews.
  • Analysis of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured interview formats.
  • Examination of studies on interviewer biases (leniency, severity, demographic factors) and potential mitigation strategies like training.

Main Results:

  • Interviews are valuable for gathering unique candidate information and serve as a key recruitment tool.
  • Increasing interview structure (standardized questions, evaluation rubrics, panel formats) improves reliability and validity.
  • Interviewer bias related to rating tendencies and applicant characteristics is a significant concern, though training can reduce it.

Conclusions:

  • Admission committees should tailor interview approaches based on candidate type and interview purpose.
  • Developing structured or semi-structured interviews focusing on non-academic criteria is recommended.
  • Comprehensive interviewer training is essential to minimize bias and enhance the fairness and accuracy of the selection process.