Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning01:19

Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning

Shaping is a technique used in operant conditioning to train complex behaviors by rewarding successive approximations toward the target behavior. This method is necessary because organisms are unlikely to perform complex behaviors spontaneously. Instead, shaping breaks down the desired behavior into small, manageable steps.
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case study in planning revisions to a veterinary professional curriculum: opportunity, motive, and means.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2011
Same author

Content analysis of a stratified random selection of JVME articles: 1974-2004.

Journal of veterinary medical education·2011
Same author

Developing a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research education programs.

Science and engineering ethics·2010
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Articulating a role for program evaluation in responsible conduct of research programs.

Lynne E Olson1

  • 1a Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , USA.

Accountability in Research
|October 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Program evaluation offers a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research (RCR) programs. This approach enhances institutional accountability and demonstrates the value of RCR initiatives.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Scientific integrity
  • Research ethics education

Background:

  • Increased interest in evaluating responsible conduct of research (RCR) programs since 2001.
  • Program evaluation methods can assess the worth and value of RCR initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Provide an overview of program evaluation principles.
  • Demonstrate the application of program evaluation to RCR.
  • Offer key references for RCR program evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of program evaluation concepts.
  • Application of evaluation principles to RCR programs.
  • Literature review for key references.

Main Results:

  • Program evaluation provides a structured approach to assess RCR programs.
  • Evaluation can inform institutions about the effectiveness and resource allocation for RCR initiatives.
  • Key references are provided to guide evaluation efforts.

Conclusions:

  • Evaluating RCR programs is crucial for institutional accountability.
  • Program evaluation methods can effectively determine the value of RCR initiatives.
  • This approach supports the responsible conduct of research.