Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell02:21

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

Cancer arises from mutations in the critical genes that allow healthy cells to escape cell cycle regulation and acquire the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Though originating from a single mutation event in one of the originator cells, cancer progresses when the mutant cell lines continue to gain more and more mutations, and finally, become malignant. For example, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develops initially as a non-lethal increase in white blood cells, which progressively...
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations01:30

Spontaneous and Induced Mutations

Spontaneous mutations arise infrequently during DNA replication due to errors in the process. A key factor behind these errors is tautomeric shifts in nitrogenous bases, where bases transition from keto to enol forms or amino to imino forms. This shift can alter base-pairing rules, leading to mutations. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) arising from aerobic metabolism can damage DNA, resulting in depurination (loss of a purine base) or depyrimidination (loss of a pyrimidine base).
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recurrent intra-tumour heterogeneity is a hallmark of metastatic prostate cancer.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Obinutuzumab, lenalidomide, and venetoclax for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: Results of the Phase Ib/II LEVERAGE study.

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

A scalable, multi-resolution consensus clustering approach for prioritizing robust signals from high-throughput screens.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Identifying therapeutic targets in low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas with no specific molecular profile.

The Journal of pathology·2026
Same author

Blending substantive and methodological expertise into statistical models: Longitudinal model development.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Investigating the contribution of rare non-coding variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 to hereditary breast cancer.

NPJ breast cancer·2026
Same journal

Human cancer genomes harbor the mutational signature of tobacco-specific nitrosamines NNN and NNK.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Identification and functional characterization of regulatory variants in DPP9 associated with COVID-19 severity.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

De novo variants in NPTN cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with autism and neuroplastin-PMCA hypofunction.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Dual functional genomics reveals a broad and convergent landscape of asciminib resistance in BCR::ABL1.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

ESR1 mutations and CDK4/6 inhibitor choice shape clonal selection and adaptive cell states during acquired resistance.

Genome medicine·2026
Same journal

Cell type-specific contextualisation of the human phenome: towards the systematic treatment of all rare diseases.

Genome medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy.

David L Goode1, Sally M Hunter2, Maria A Doyle3

  • 1Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sarcoma Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, St. Andrew's Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Genome Medicine
|October 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Identifying true somatic mutations in sequencing data is difficult. A consensus approach using multiple algorithms and validation methods achieved over 98% accuracy for somatic mutation detection.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
11:02

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing

Published on: October 18, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Distinguishing true somatic mutations from sequencing artifacts is a significant challenge in cancer genomics.
  • Accurate somatic mutation detection is crucial for understanding cancer development and for clinical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate methods for optimal somatic mutation detection.
  • To identify factors influencing the accuracy of somatic mutation prediction algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Validated predictions from three somatic mutation detection algorithms: MuTect, JointSNVMix2, and SomaticSniper.
  • Employed Sanger sequencing for validation of algorithm predictions.
  • Utilized read depth, mapping quality, and additional prediction methods to refine partial consensus calls.

Main Results:

  • A full consensus approach achieved a validation rate exceeding 98% for somatic mutations.
  • Partial consensus predictions also showed high validation rates, particularly when supported by additional data.
  • Read depth, mapping quality, and complementary methods effectively filtered inaccurate predictions in partial consensus cases.

Conclusions:

  • The developed consensus approach offers a fast, flexible, and high-confidence method for identifying putative somatic mutations.
  • This strategy enhances the reliability of somatic mutation detection in massively parallel sequencing data.