Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
T-cell co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation: two steps forward one step back!
Leonardo V Riella1, Mohamed H Sayegh
1Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division , 221 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115 , USA +1 617 732 5259 ; +1 617 732 5254 ; lriella@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
Introduction:
The concern about nephrotoxicity with calcineurin inhibitors led to the search of novel agents for immunosuppression. Based on the requirement of T-cell co-stimulatory signals to fully activated naïve T cells, it became clear that blocking these pathways could be an appealing therapeutic target. However, some unexpected findings were noticed in the recent clinical trials of belatacept, including a higher rate of rejection, which warranted further investigation with some interesting concepts emerging from the bench.
Areas Covered:
This article aims to review the literature of the B7:CD28 co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation, including the basic immunology behind its development, clinical application and potential limitations.
Expert Opinion:
Targeting co-stimulatory pathways were found to be much more complex than initially anticipated due to the interplay between not only various co-stimulatory pathways but also various co-inhibitory ones. In addition, co-stimulatory signals have different roles in diverse immune cell types. Therefore, targeting CD28 ligands with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4)-Ig may have some deleterious effects, including the inhibition of regulatory T cells, blockade of co-inhibitory signals (CTLA4) and promotion of Th17 cells. Co-stimulatory independence of memory T cells was another unforeseen limitation. Learning how to better integrate co-stimulatory targeting with other immunosuppressive agents will be critical for the improvement of long-term graft survival.
Insights
Blocking T-cell co-stimulatory pathways, like B7:CD28, is a complex immunosuppression strategy. Unexpected outcomes in belatacept trials highlight the need for better integration with other agents for improved graft survival.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Drug Development
Background:
- Nephrotoxicity concerns with calcineurin inhibitors spurred research into novel immunosuppressants.
- T-cell co-stimulatory pathways emerged as potential therapeutic targets for immunosuppression.
- Belatacept clinical trials revealed unexpected rejection rates, necessitating further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the literature on B7:CD28 co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation.
- To explore the underlying immunology, clinical applications, and limitations of this approach.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of B7:CD28 co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation.
- Analysis of basic immunology, clinical applications, and limitations.
Main Results:
- Targeting co-stimulatory pathways is more complex than initially thought due to interplay with co-inhibitory pathways.
- Co-stimulatory signals have varied roles across different immune cell types.
- Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4)-Ig blockade may inhibit regulatory T cells and promote Th17 cells.
Conclusions:
- Co-stimulatory independence of memory T cells presents an unforeseen limitation.
- Integrating co-stimulatory targeting with other immunosuppressive agents is crucial for enhancing long-term graft survival.
Related Concept Videos
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...

