Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

Evaluation of medical simulations.

William L Bewley¹, Harold F O'Neil

¹National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles, 10945 Le Conte Avenue, Suite 1400, Mailbox 957150, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7150.

Military Medicine

|October 3, 2013

Summary

High-quality evaluations are crucial for effective medical simulations. This article outlines methods to improve the technical quality of simulation-based medical education research for reliable results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Designing and using computer simulations in medical education and training: an introduction.

Military medicine·2013

Same author

Evaluation and research for technology: not just playing around.

Evaluation and program planning·2013

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Simulation Technology
Research Methodology

Background:

Simulation-based medical education (SBME) offers significant potential for training healthcare professionals.
Existing research reviews reveal that most SBME effectiveness evaluations lack sufficient technical quality.
This deficiency compromises the trustworthiness and reliability of study findings.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the critical issues impacting the technical quality of SBME evaluations.
To present methods and criteria for enhancing the rigor of simulation effectiveness research.
To guide future research in developing robust evaluation techniques.

Main Methods:

Discussion of technical quality criteria for SBME evaluations.

More Related Videos

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Exploration of available measures for assessing medical simulation effectiveness.

Analysis of approaches to scoring simulation performance and methodological strategies.

Main Results:

Identified key factors limiting the technical quality of current SBME evaluations.
Proposed a framework for improving the technical rigor of simulation research.
Highlighted the need for standardized and validated evaluation methods.

Conclusions:

Improving the technical quality of evaluations is essential for advancing SBME.
Future directions involve enhanced methods and technologies for robust simulation assessment.
Reliable evaluation data will better inform the integration of simulations into medical curricula.