Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Fibrinolytic treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Update 2014
1Dr. Sigrun Halvorsen, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, 0407 Oslo, Norway, Tel. +47/22 11 91 01; Fax +47/22 11 91 81, E-mail: sigrun.h@online.no; sighalvo@ous-hf.no.
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is preferred for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when timely. Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is recommended for delayed PPCI, with a pharmaco-invasive strategy showing non-inferiority in long-transfer-delay areas.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the standard reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 90-120 minutes.
- Timely PPCI is not universally accessible, necessitating alternative reperfusion strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence supporting fibrinolytic therapy (FT) in STEMI.
- To discuss the role of FT in the current PPCI era.
- To outline optimal post-FT management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence on FT and PPCI in STEMI.
- Discussion of clinical guidelines and treatment algorithms.
- Analysis of the pharmaco-invasive strategy.
Main Results:
- FT is recommended for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delays (>90-120 minutes) and no contraindications.
- Pre-hospital initiation of FT is preferred.
- A pharmaco-invasive strategy (FT followed by PCI) is non-inferior to PPCI for patients with long transfer delays (>60 minutes).
Conclusions:
- FT remains a crucial reperfusion option for STEMI when PPCI is delayed.
- The pharmaco-invasive approach offers a viable alternative to primary PCI in specific patient populations.
- Optimal management involves timely FT followed by transfer to a PCI-capable center.
Abstract:
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), as long as it can be delivered within 90-120 minutes from patient's first medical contact, and is the leading reperfusion strategy in most European countries. However, as PPCI cannot be offered in a timely manner to all patients, fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is the recommended choice in patients with an anticipated delay to PPCI of >90-120 minutes, presenting early after symptom onset and without contra-indications. FT should preferably be started in the pre-hospital setting. Following FT, all patients should be transferred to a PCI-center for rescue PCI or routine coronary angiography with PCI as indicated. Such a pharmaco-invasive strategy, combining FT with invasive treatment, has recently been shown to be non-inferior to PPCI in patients living in areas with long transfer delays to PCI (>60 minutes). In this overview, we will briefly present the evidence for the benefit of FT in STEMI, and discuss the role of FT in the current era of PPCI as well as the optimal treatment following pharmacologic reperfusion.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Angina IV: Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

