Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review

Hannah I Awai1, Kimberly P Newton2, Claude B Sirlin3

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California; Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California.

Insights

Current imaging methods like ultrasonography are not reliable for diagnosing pediatric fatty liver disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows promise but requires more research for accurate assessment of liver fat in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Hepatology

Background:

  • Pediatric fatty liver disease poses risks for cirrhosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular issues.
  • Liver biopsy is the standard but invasive; noninvasive methods are needed for children.
  • A systematic review evaluated imaging techniques for assessing pediatric liver fat.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review studies on imaging liver fat in children.
  • To assess the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive imaging modalities for pediatric hepatic steatosis.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed (1982-2012) using "imaging liver fat."
  • Included English-language studies of children (0-18 years) measuring hepatic steatosis with imaging and a quantitative reference.
  • Analyzed 9 studies (610 children) evaluating ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Main Results:

  • Ultrasonography showed limited diagnostic value (47-62% PPV) with inconsistent correlation to reference standards.
  • MRI-based liver fat measurements varied by methodology; correlation with histology was observed but lacked diagnostic accuracy assessment due to sample size.
  • No consistent relationship between ultrasound steatosis scores and reference measurements was found.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence does not support ultrasonography for diagnosing or grading pediatric fatty liver.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential tool, but insufficient data exists for evidence-based recommendations on its use in children.
  • Further research is needed to establish reliable noninvasive imaging methods for pediatric hepatic steatosis.
Abstract