Understanding the need of ventricular pressure for the estimation of diastolic biomarkers
Jiahe Xi1, Wenzhe Shi, Daniel Rueckert
1Department of Computer Science, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, jiahe.xi@cs.ox.ac.uk.
Insights
This study explores non-invasive methods to assess left ventricular diastolic function, focusing on myocardial stiffness and relaxation. It shows potential for using medical imaging to estimate these crucial diastolic biomarkers without invasive pressure measurements.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function relies on relaxation (active tension decay) and myocardial stiffness.
- Accurate assessment of diastolic residual active tension (AT) and stiffness is clinically vital.
- Previous methods required invasive LV pressure measurements, limiting widespread application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of using non-invasive pressure measurements for estimating LV diastolic mechanical parameters.
- To assess the accuracy of these non-invasive methods for determining myocardial stiffness and diastolic residual AT.
Main Methods:
- Model-based parameter estimation using clinically acquired motion and non-invasively measured pressure data.
- Evaluation of pressure-volume relationships and synthetic data with varying pressure offsets.
- Quantification of parameter estimation errors (stiffness and AT) against non-invasive pressure offsets.
Main Results:
- Non-invasive pressure estimation showed reasonable accuracy for stiffness but limitations for residual AT when using generic pressure-volume relationships.
- Synthetic data analysis revealed maximum errors of 11% for stiffness and 22% for AT due to pressure offsets.
- Averaged pressure measurement offset error was 0.17 kPa, primarily influenced by the temporal resolution of imaging data.
Conclusions:
- Non-invasive assessment of diastolic biomarkers is potentially feasible using medical imaging data.
- Further improvements in imaging temporal resolution are needed to minimize estimation errors.
- This approach offers a promising alternative to invasive methods for evaluating LV diastolic function.
Abstract:
The diastolic function (i.e., blood filling) of the left ventricle (LV) is determined by its capacity for relaxation, or the decay in residual active tension (AT) generated during systole, and its constitutive material properties, or myocardial stiffness. The clinical determination of these two factors (diastolic residual AT and stiffness) is thus essential for assessing LV diastolic function. To quantify these two factors, in our previous work, a novel model-based parameter estimation approach was proposed and successfully applied to multiple cases using clinically acquired motion and invasively measured ventricular pressure data. However, the need to invasively acquire LV pressure limits the wide application of this approach. In this study, we address this issue by analyzing the feasibility of using two kinds of non-invasively available pressure measurements for the purpose of inverse mechanical parameter estimation. The prescription of pressure based on a generic pressure-volume (P-V) relationship reported in literature is first evaluated in a set of 18 clinical cases (10 healthy and 8 diseased), finding reasonable results for stiffness but not for residual active tension. We then investigate the use of non-invasive pressure measures, now available through imaging techniques and limited by unknown or biased offset values. Specifically, three sets of physiologically realistic synthetic data with three levels of diastolic residual active tension (i.e., impaired relaxation capability) are designed to quantify the percentage error in the parameter estimation against the possible pressure offsets within the physiological limits. Maximum errors are quantified as 11 % for the magnitude of stiffness and 22 % for AT, with averaged 0.17 kPa error in pressure measurement offset using the state-of-the-art non-invasive pressure estimation method. The main cause for these errors is the limited temporal resolution of clinical imaging data currently available. These results demonstrate the potential feasibility of the estimation diastolic biomarkers with non-invasive assessment of pressure through medical imaging data.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...


