Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

05:25
Simultaneous Detection of Different Antibody Classes in a Multiplexed Serological Test
Published on: July 14, 2023
Heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays
Nils Bolstad1, David J Warren, Kjell Nustad
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway.
Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
|October 8, 2013
Summary
Heterophilic antibodies can interfere with immunometric assays, leading to inaccurate results. This review covers strategies for clinicians, laboratorians, and manufacturers to mitigate this interference and ensure reliable diagnostic testing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Immunology
- Diagnostic Assay Development
Background:
- Immunometric assays are susceptible to interference from heterophilic antibodies, which are endogenous antibodies that can bind to assay components.
- This interference can lead to clinically significant errors, potentially impacting patient diagnosis and treatment.
- The prevalence of heterophilic antibody interference necessitates proactive management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and discuss strategies for minimizing the impact of heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays.
- To guide clinicians, laboratorians, and the immunoassay industry in addressing this diagnostic challenge.
- To highlight future challenges posed by evolving antibody-based therapeutics and diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on heterophilic antibody interference and mitigation techniques.
- Discussion of clinical and laboratory best practices for managing assay interference.
- Analysis of immunoassay design considerations to incorporate protective measures.
Main Results:
- Heterophilic antibody interference can cause devastating consequences, including false positive or negative results.
- Effective strategies involve careful test ordering by clinicians, confirmatory testing by laboratorians, and specific design measures by manufacturers.
- Use of antibody fragments and blocking agents are examples of protective measures in assay design.
Conclusions:
- Addressing heterophilic antibody interference requires a multi-faceted approach involving all stakeholders in the diagnostic process.
- Clinicians must critically evaluate results, laboratorians must implement confirmatory methods, and manufacturers must build interference resistance into assays.
- Proactive measures are essential to maintain the integrity of diagnostic testing in the face of evolving antibody technologies.
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is a highly selective and sensitive technique for accurate elemental analysis. Though the analysis of ICP–MS mass spectra is comparatively straightforward, it is affected by spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic interferences. Spectroscopic interferences arise when the plasma contains ionic species with an m/z value the same as the analyte ion. Spectroscopic interference can be categorized as isobaric, polyatomic ions, and refractory oxide ion...
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitation, or IP, is a widely used technique that employs protein-antibody interactions to isolate proteins or protein complexes in their native state for studying protein-protein interactions, quaternary structures, or supramolecular complexes. Various modifications of the technique, including chromatin IP, cross-linking IP, and fluorescence IP, are commonly used.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...
Humoral Immune Responses
Overview

