Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with data...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A clinician's guide to performing a case series study.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Testing agreement between a new method and the gold standard-how do we test?

Pat McLaughlin1

  • 1College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, PO Box 14428 MCMC, Melbourne 8001, Victoria, Australia; Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.

Journal of Biomechanics
|October 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Researchers often struggle with data analysis, particularly when comparing new methods to gold standards. This paper clarifies statistical methods for assessing agreement between measurement techniques, crucial for biomechanics research.

Keywords:
AgreementBland and AltmanRelationshipStatistical techniques

More Related Videos

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Statistical analysis
  • Research methodology

Background:

  • Data analysis presents significant challenges in research studies.
  • Traditional statistical training focuses on differences and relationships, not method agreement.
  • Comparing a new method to a gold standard requires assessing agreement, not just differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenges in determining if a new method is as good as a gold standard.
  • To improve the understanding and application of statistical methods for assessing agreement.
  • To provide guidance for biomechanics researchers on evaluating measurement method agreement.

Main Methods:

  • This paper is a perspectives piece, focusing on informing readers.
  • It reviews and clarifies statistical approaches for assessing agreement between two methods.
  • It highlights the less rigorous application of agreement testing in current literature.

Main Results:

  • Analysis of papers in this journal indicates a need for improved statistical rigor in agreement testing.
  • Biomechanics researchers may benefit from a deeper understanding of agreement assessment techniques.
  • Current practices in testing for agreement lack the rigor typically applied to testing for differences.

Conclusions:

  • A better understanding of statistical methods is needed to improve the assessment of agreement.
  • This paper aims to enhance the rigor of agreement testing in biomechanics research.
  • Accurate assessment of method agreement is vital for validating new research techniques.