[Diagnostic laparoscopy in gynecological cancer, prophylactic oophorectomy: feasibility study on 22 cases]

The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopy in a cohort of 22 patients admitted for bilateral oophorectomy (n=11) and preoperative diagnostic laparoscopy (n=11).

Between December 2012 and May 2013, we included 22 patients in our study. All selected patients received a questionnaire the day before surgery. The questionnaire consisted of chapters on intraoperatively, and the postoperative assessments of patients regarding a possible return home on the evening of surgery. The ability to output was measured with the score of Chung at the evening of surgery and in the morning before leaving.

The mean age of patients was 60 years. The average length of stay was 1.2 days. Postoperative pain tends to be higher in the morning in the bilateral oophorectomy group (P=0.06), nausea and vomiting are the same in both groups. In the bilateral oophorectomy group, six patients were able to go out and five wished it; in the diagnostic laparoscopy group nine patients were able to go out and two wished it, this difference was significant (P=0.041).

The outpatient hospital is the norm for many surgeries. In our study, 47% of patients able to go out wishing that output. This difference is important when comparing the two groups. There are more patients wishing an output in the oophorectomy group. This reduction in length of stay must be compensated by a medical and paramedical supervision at home.

A large number of surgical procedure are performed on an outpatient basis. Patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy are more fragile, they should receive active postoperative support to enable an outpatient hospital.