Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

14.8K

Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface.

John E Davies1, Vanessa C Mendes, James C H Ko

  • 1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada; Dental Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada.

Biomaterials
|October 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The long-term outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures: A retrospective study.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2026
Same author

A Retrospective Cohort Study on Site-Specific Early and Late Implant Failure in Single Teeth.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025
Same author

Retrospective analysis of dental implant fracture following loading: A retrospective clinical study.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2025
Same author

The Role of Implant Coronal Surface Properties on Early Adhesion of Streptococcus Oralis-An In Vitro Comparative Study.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2025
Same author

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments for Excessive Gingival Display.

Dentistry journal·2024
Same author

Lung Transplant Immunomodulation with Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Therapeutic Window for Interleukin-10.

Cells·2024
Same journal

A dual-engineered chondrocyte-targeting tetrahedral DNA-based nanoparticle for improved delivery of metformin and alleviation in osteoarthritis.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Machine learning-guided design of cooperative multi-size hydrogel microspheres for osteoarthritis therapy.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Cationic nanotrap curbs UVB-induced cutaneous photodamage via exosomal cfNA capture.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

A protein-initiated polymerization cascade enables a self-eliminating powder tissue adhesive for diabetic ulcer repair.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Oral colon-targeted micro-nano formulation engineered in microfluid for synergistic therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Manganese@Gold cluster-coordinated covalent organic frameworks-based artificial metalloenzymes with cascade biocatalysis and amplified systemic stimulation to combat malignant tumor metastasis.

Biomaterials·2026
See all related articles

Implant surface topography, especially sub-micron crystals and micro-scale features, enhances bone anchorage through biological mechanisms like bone sialoprotein deposition and collagen mineralization. This improves implant stability and osseointegration.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Endosseous implant success relies on osseointegration and stable bone anchorage.
  • Surface topography of dental and orthopedic implants significantly influences biological responses.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of implant-bone interaction is crucial for improving implant design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the biological mechanisms by which endosseous implant surface topography promotes bone anchorage.
  • To investigate the role of different topographical scales (nano- to micro-scale) on implant osseointegration.
  • To correlate in vitro cell behavior with in vivo bone formation around implants.

Main Methods:

  • Implantation of commercially pure titanium implants with varied topographies (acid etching, grit blasting, calcium phosphate nanocrystals) in rat femora.
Keywords:
Bone anchorageBone implantBone-bondingSurface topographyThree scale rangesTrue and functional interfaces

More Related Videos

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

14.8K
Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

10.3K
  • Mechanical testing and electron microscopy of the bone-implant interface.
  • In vitro culture of rat bone marrow cells on surrogate implants to assess bone sialoprotein deposition.
  • Main Results:

    • Sub-micron scale crystals on implant surfaces led to bone-bonding via cement line matrix interdigitation.
    • Bone sialoprotein deposition occurred in the interstices and undercuts of nanocrystals.
    • Micron-sized pits on implant surfaces were occupied by mineralized matrix, enhancing anchorage.
    • Collagen mineralization around coarse-micron features contributed to a mechanically stable interface.

    Conclusions:

    • Implant surface topography at both nano- and micro-scales provides distinct biological mechanisms for bone anchorage.
    • The study offers mechanistic insights into optimizing implant surface design for enhanced osseointegration and stability.
    • Findings support the development of biologically-relevant criteria for assessing implant surface topography.